THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE ACCORDING TO GENESIS.

In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.

The earth was formless and empty, and darkness covered the face of the Abyss,

but the Spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters.

God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.

CRYS

INTRODUCTION TO 21ST-CENTURY COSMOLOGY

Here is the world’s best-kept secret. During the 3,500 years that have passed from Moses to Christ Raúl, no human being was permitted to break the Seal with which YAHWEH God decreed that the History of the Creation of the Heavens and the Earth remain beyond the reach of the intellect for millennia—until the Day set by His Foreknowledge, that is.

Now that this Seal has been opened, and the hieroglyph written by Moses has been revealed for all nations to read, the Intelligence of YAHWEH God, its Creator, is magnified to infinity—all the more so because the sages and geniuses of every age attempted to open this Seal and read its contents, yet were unable to do so. The wisdom of YAHWEH God, Creator of the Universe, is all the more exalted and inaccessible when one considers that the man to whom He has granted the honor of opening this Seal and reading its contents to all nations is nothing more than a man with no education beyond the basic knowledge typical of his time and people.

Obviously, the obstacle this Book must overcome is multiplied by the number of men who, frustrated by their inability to open the Seal of Genesis, convinced themselves that this impossibility stemmed from the fact that the biblical account of Genesis is nothing more than “a metaphor devoid of any scientific content.”

Since human intelligence was created to rise to the image of divine intelligence—as it is written, “Let us make man in our image and in our likeness”—that frustration could only give rise to a vision of the origin of the universe designed to drown out human ignorance and keep “the omnipotence of scientific reason” afloat. The fruit of this emotional duality brought into the world a Godless cosmology—defensive at first, and later offensive, that is, anti-creationist—with the aim of preserving human greatness in the face of “the death of God.”

Now, God does not lie; it was not in vain that He said of Himself, “I am the Truth.” Thus, since He has written the Account of the Creation of our Universe in the form of hieroglyphs, precisely because it is impossible to penetrate His Text without the guidance of its Author, and because this impossibility is manifested in the fall of twentieth-century science into the abyss of Nazism—it was precisely because of this impossibility that the very existence of the Text became a promise of revelation, to be fulfilled, thanks to Christ, on a date known exclusively to Him.

In short, the Seal was to be opened, and the Mystery of its Contents brought to light.

Now, since 19th-century scientific atheism had evolved into 20th-century cosmology, and since the 20th century had constructed an artificial structure for the unreal edifice of its fictitious image of the Universe in Time and Space, logically the clash between such an artificial and fictitious vision and the true image of the Universe, now revealed, is bound to set sparks flying.

Let us say that the need to base a cosmological image—one with no support in the structure of Reality—on pseudoscientific principles gave rise, around that castle in the air that was 20th-century science, an entire neo-pagan religion, with universities as temples and the Academy of Sciences as the Vatican, thereby demonstrating—even in its atheism—that any human structure aspiring to be invincible must follow the model that Christ established during his lifetime: the Catholic Church.

In their aspirations for immortality, both the Third Reich and the Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist Party did not hesitate to adapt the Catholic structure to their parties. The anti-creationist atheism of the 20th century was no exception, nor did it fail to bring that copy to perfection—all the more so since among its builders were the geniuses who gave birth to the Atomic Age.

God’s task in this century is neither small nor insignificant.

But it is in the face of impossibility that Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence manifest their true infinite and eternal nature.

As for the literary aspect, I must take full responsibility for any flaws this little book may have. Being an Introduction does not imply infallibility or dogma. However, since its foundations were laid by the Creator of Heaven and Earth Himself, any departure from those foundations is to reopen the door to World Wars.

Over the years, my thinking has evolved. The original foundation remains.

Reading this little book is not easy, nor do I intend to adapt my style to the demands of the market. My task is made all the more difficult by the complex artificial structure that 20th-century cosmology built around the atheism of the scientific community.

Many geniuses used Newton’s shoulders as a springboard toward those of Einstein. Setting aside the technological and scientific revolutions of the past two centuries, the heirs to that cosmological system—founded on a hypothesis whose greatness lay in having reinvented a universe that existed only in their minds— today’s astronomers prefer to continue working with their eyes closed to the data rather than jeopardize that marvelous, man-made cosmological edifice and, under the weight of the evidence, be forced to sign off on the demolition of the religion of 20th-century atheism. Divine Truth, however, is invincible. The data stored in the astronomical memory of the 21st century rises up to sweep away, in one fell swoop, that castle in the air that was the 20th century.

The Dynamic Structure of our Skies—this Firmament of the Heavens that every night opens our eyes to the immensities of its Creation, and from which, due to Historical Social Barbarism, men have been alienated from its free contemplation, being slaves as they are to an Animal Social System founded precisely upon that Cosmological System from whose bosom all the Evils of the 20th Century were born; when we study the physical data provided by natural astronomy, we discover a structure of infinite beauty whose foundations open the eyes of our thought to the existence of a creative wisdom established upon the boundless intelligence of an Almighty Being whose power has been placed at the service of the Tree of the Sciences of the Creation of Universes, in whose activity His Being acquires the supernatural properties proper to the Creator of the Cosmos: omniscience and omnipotence.

It is logical, then, that when faced with the question of whether or not the CSXX exists—insofar as it is a Religion of Science—today’s astronomers remain blind to the evidence that Universal Astrophysical Data lays before them.

My work in this context consists of making the difficult simple and showing that the Light that blinds the eyes is the Light that opens the human being’s intellect to the Image of the Divine Intelligence of their Creator. For people continue to prefer to live under animal-like conditions solely and exclusively out of fear of experiencing a Freedom that, in the Image and Likeness of the Divine, overcomes all things and confronts the problems of Space and Time with the victorious consciousness of one who has learned that Living is an Adventure, an Epic in constant and continuous progress toward a Horizon that reveals its nature as one approaches its Mark. In the words of our Creator, God the Only-Begotten Son, our King and Lord, our Father and Teacher: “Each day will bring its own concerns.”

I understand that, having worked in this realm of the Creation of our Universe with the perseverance of one who has dedicated his life to recreating the True Image of our Heavens and their Relationship in Space and Time with the Cosmos in which they were created—and having trained my mind to work with simple images supported by Natural Astronomical Data— I must start from a clear Universal Principle that leaves no room for doubt and serves as a Bridge between the 20th century and this Introduction to the 21st century. To meet this need, I will state right now that this Introduction is exactly what its title indicates: “An Introduction.” Whoever opens the Door fulfills their task; it falls to those who enter to continue working and updating cosmological and astrophysical thought so that future generations may move through the coming centuries on ground nourished by a Tree of Creative Sciences whose Fruit lives under the Law of Life and not under the Law of Death—which was the Fruit that the tree of scientific atheism came to serve the 20th century.

Regarding the Origin of the Cosmos—establishing here the Principle of Our Universe as a Work subsequent to the Creation of the Cosmos, and a Cosmos that was created to serve as the Field of Raw Matter from which its Creator would draw for the Creation of New Universes—this Cosmological Origin took place through a Massive Transformation of astrophysical matter into cosmic energy; global energy that, upon being redirected toward spacetime energy fields, began its journey back to astrophysical matter.

Essentially, this Original Big Bang continues to occur at the Frontiers of the Cosmos, where the cosmic energy created by the galaxies is captured by spacetime energy fields that transform energy into matter. And so on to infinity, for all eternity—hence the natural expansion ad infinitum of the Cosmos. The creation of galaxies is an endless process that the Creator of the Original Big Bang sustains by expanding the space at the frontiers of His creation as time materializes into galaxies and galaxy clusters.

It is no coincidence, then, that the Radioastronomical Revolution we are experiencing continues to add new galaxies to those already detected, expanding the frontiers of the Cosmos as this new accumulation opens our eyes to an Expansion that is entirely distinct from any Final Cosmological Contraction.

Just as Eternity, the Infinite, and God have neither Beginning nor End: Creation has come to remain forever and ever. On the contrary, to deny the Expansion of the Cosmos to Infinity by asserting a Contraction set to begin at some point along the line of Eternity is to succumb to science fiction—that is, to return to the Age of Fallacy of the 20th century, when a Hypothesis was Law until its Evil was proven. Since the evil of the 20th century has ravaged the Earth with two world wars, persisting in such a fallacy is to declare open war against the human race, against life, and against God.

And to conclude this Prologue, the firsthand observation of the evolution that the astronomical and physical sciences in general have undergone over the past 40 years serves as a source of intellectual resources conducive to the development of a clear and seamless understanding of the natural image that corresponds to our heavens and our Earth. There can be no doubt at this point that the image projected by the geological and astronomical sciences to humankind affects its stance toward its own civilization and its attitude toward the universe. Seeking to pass the buck and blame one’s own ills on a force external to the system itself is a pathological recourse that, as is evident from the historical reality in which we currently find ourselves, leads nowhere—or rather, it does lead to a very specific place: destruction.

 The role that the natural sciences played in the outbreak of World War II is a mea culpa that hangs in the air like a tombstone.

 The relationship between Knowledge and Behavior—a principle fully embraced by the sciences since the earliest days of ethology, to avoid going too far back in time—means that the role Scientific Atheism, underpinned by 20th-century science, played in the tragedy of the 20th century is beyond dispute. Unless, of course, they now want us all to be not only blind but also brainless.

Personally, I do not believe that Evil acted consciously. But once Consciousness is acquired, the consequences of Freedom cannot be attributed to the Impossibility of breaking a Seal that God kept sealed with His Fist and His Word. There is, therefore, no Condemnation; nor is it my task to judge the Thinkers of the past centuries. Truth lies beyond judgment of others; it is in its very nature to set free those who found themselves trapped in the darkness of a Silence rooted in a Cosmological Necessity that has now been overcome.

Let us, then, open the Door that for 3,500 years has remained closed—for the glory of our Divine Creator and the liberation of all the nations of humankind from the forces that the ignorance born of the Fall of the First Man unleashed upon all the peoples of the Earth.

CHAPTER 1

DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES

1. But, to begin with—and since one must always choose a good starting point—I will say that this study on the Memory of the Creation of the Universe (Heavens and Earth) has its origin in the need to open Faith to the scientific principles of Nature. I do not intend to base Faith on such principles, for Faith has been and is founded on the supernatural principles of which the Gospels are the Eternal Treatise. The Incarnation and the Resurrection are the two pillars of the Temple of Faith; when it comes to questions about the Origin of all things, the only explanation our parents could give us—and that we ourselves have been able to give our children, up to now—is the Account of the Creation of the Universe according to Genesis. That is to say, “God created the heavens and the earth”… And the rest—the “how” and the “when”—are aspects of the Creative Activity that we may or may not understand, but which neither add to nor detract from the Faith.

2. The task I have set for myself in this book is to resolve the first of these two unknowns: “the How.” For although Faith is invincible, no one can deny that Faith without Reason is corruptible, as has been amply demonstrated over the centuries. We must, therefore, attribute all the errors of Christianity to ignorance. Consequently, in this book I will go straight to the Truth; and the truth is this: the Universe—this astrophysical engineering structure within whose walls our Solar System orbits—has been created by the God of Genesis. The opposite—the alleged circumstantial fact that this final ensemble of breathtaking beauty we call “the Universe” arose from a chaotic series of elements—did not cause scientific materialism any psychological conflict whatsoever, insofar as science denied the existence of a Natural Aesthetic. (This topic of the Aesthetics of the Heavens and its role in stimulating intelligence is a matter that scientific atheism declared to be the result of a series of coincidences, all originating in Chaos. As for the rest—how it is possible for Chaos to produce Heavens of such breathtaking beauty—this is a question they refused to answer. Or they responded with the contempt that a fool’s question deserves.) It is no coincidence that the father of ethology and Nobel laureate Konrad Lorenz linked Knowledge and Behavior in his classic equation: “Truth = Survival; Falsehood = Destruction.”

3. The examples that the wise Konrad Lorenz, the father of ethology, presented to us when speaking about the direct relationship between Knowledge and Behavior are infinite, but in essence they converge on a universal conclusion; namely: positive Behavior—or behavior related to survival, adaptation, and evolution—in every living being is the fruit of its true and real Knowledge of Nature; information it acquires through its senses, on the one hand; and through its phylogenetic heritage, on the other; such that, based on the nature of a species’ actual behavior, we can define the nature of the knowledge that serves as its foundation for moving through space and time.

In other words, if we provide an individual with false information about the environment in which it moves, the consequence will be that it begins to veer erratically. Example: If we convey false information to an individual on the move regarding the length of a gap in their path—which they must prepare to cross as they approach—by presenting two meters as a fact when the truth is that it is ten meters, the acceptance of this falsehood will lead to their downfall.

In animals, it is the senses—whatever they may be—that gather information as movement occurs. In intelligent beings, such as humans, information comes from communication; therefore, the individual is exposed to external factual manipulation, which, by directing their behavior, may or may not seek their destruction. Now, when it is the entire species—the whole human race, in this case—that is moving along a self-destructive path, logically we must speak of an intellectual pathology that, by affecting all human beings, must inevitably drag them all into the abyss of their extinction. And since cosmology concerns the structure of nature—the origin of all life on Earth—the global self-destructive behavior exhibited by humankind must be sought in a pathology of the intellect, which intellectually recreates the nature of the world in which humankind lives, exists, and is.

4. Returning to the metaphysical topic, the fact is that ethics is not involved in genetics either, and yet its manifestation occurs at all known historical levels. Thus, since the need is innate, Knowledge forms part of our genetic structure. Or, to put it another way, we would not react to the Aesthetics of the Universe if our genetic structure were not prepared to respond to the sparks that the Heavens set off in our brains.

Thus, by denying the relationship between Natural Intelligence and Universal Aesthetics, scientific materialism effectively derailed the train of creationist cosmological research. Against that attempt, it must be said that the history of civilizations, from their earliest days, maintains a record of the responses of different cultures to this natural stimulus (Natural Intelligence–Universal Aesthetics), over which the human race—being, as it was, in its Ontological Infancy—had no capacity for manipulation or control. In other words, human beings react to the Beauty of the Universe as naturally as trees do to the arrival of spring and the winds of winter.

Since “Admiration is the mother of Philosophical Thought,” it is Nature itself—bearing within its Universal Structure the imprint of its Creator’s Intelligence— its effect on Life—which cannot be anything other than an Intelligent Creature “in the image and likeness of its Creator”—engenders in human beings Metaphysical Thought, on the basis of which they transcend the very materiality of the information registered by the senses to rise to a Universal External Cause that has its Origin in God.

In this regard, one might object that Metaphysics has little or nothing to do with Cosmology. This is a baseless objection, for Philosophy—being the mother of Metaphysics—is the fire that kindles Intelligence within the Being, leading it to Science. And Science directs its Thought toward Creation—a pattern of behavior that we observe in all civilizations. From this, we deduce that the Creator’s imprint is integrated into Creation to elevate the Life of His Creature to its Existence and Participation in Eternity.

5. As for the Creation of Intelligent Life upon the face of the Earth—specifically, speaking of Homo sapiens adanensis, the human being in its Ontological Infancy—Man’s response to the Universe’s stimulus in his Brain was the Word. That is to say, if Science has its origins in the act of wonder, that very act revolutionized the Future of Man long before, opening his mouth to articulate his First Word.

The First Word—the word of wonder par excellence—what else could it be but “God!”

In fact, the biblical account of the Creation of the Universe has its origin in the fulfillment of that stimulus which awakened in Man the quest for knowledge of the Origin of all things. Amid the various responses that the different nations of antiquity offered to that stimulus (Celestial Aesthetics—Natural Intelligence), the Biblical Response created a gap between Moses and his contemporaries as insurmountable as it was impossible for the Pharaoh to cross the Red Sea.

6. Indeed, compared to Moses’ account of the Creation of the Universe, the cosmogonic tales of ancient peoples bore the mark of the historical trauma experienced by their ancestors somewhere on the other side of the Flood. Gods, demons, the ocean, the sky, the earth, demigods… All the paranoias of those men mingled into a mythical chaos from whose depths nothing good could emerge except the justification for the social behavior that was their historical legacy. That is why, in this book, I prefer to leave for another occasion an analysis of the genesis of antiquity’s responses to the challenge of the cosmos. Nor will I lose myself in the analysis and refutation of modern cosmological theories, for, although cloaked in a different guise, the Atomic Age’s answers to the old classical questions about the Origin and Structure of the Universe had their roots in the very same psychological attitude that dragged ancient man into the Age of myths and legends.

In due course, when the occasion arises, I will dissect their frameworks until the nature of their hypotheses is laid bare. Since this New Cosmology is not the development of a previous hypothesis, nor is it indebted to any of them, the historical theory set in motion by this book has no reason to follow the same method of cataloging and refuting all the hypotheses that, from the days of the Classical World to the Atomic Age, have sought to do the same—that is, to satisfy humanity’s need for knowledge. And considering that freedom of expression joins with freedom of thought to create its own method, I have preferred to follow as my course of action the framework that Moses laid out in Genesis. I say this fully aware that without the work of past generations, it would be impossible for me to be here today.

Now, bearing in mind that this progress has already been inscribed in the history of our civilization from the moment its Founder—none other than the One who, opening His mouth, said, “LET THERE BE LIGHT”—this Introduction acknowledges no other kinship than with the One who has ordained that human intelligence find the open door to the Science of Creation. The sciences have fulfilled a sacred historical function, none other than to prepare the intellect of our century to access the boundless intellect of our Creator.

7. From the study of the history of the sciences in general, and of astronomy in particular, we see in what manner and to what extent ignorance was the legacy bequeathed to humankind by the generation of those mythical founders of the first cities built by human hands, whose golden age was reached when “the crown descended from heaven,” when the cities were erected as the body of the First King of the Earth, that Adam who, defying the Law and spurning Peace on the path toward the civilization of the fullness of the nations of humankind, made Holy War his iron law—a legacy that led everyone to Death. Destruction where the delicate relationship between Knowledge and Behavior is most clearly seen.

“False” information about the Creator’s Identity and Personality—accepted as true and certain—triggered the first global civil war, enacted in the fratricide of Cain versus Abel; information that, had it not been accepted—and had Mankind instead embarked on a direct Path toward Universal Civilization—would have spared the Human Race so much misfortune.

But since we are not in this little book to set the record straight for the historians of Antiquity, it is best that we set aside for now the topic of the Fall in light of the historical sciences, and we will have time, when God wills it, to travel to the Seventh Millennium B.C. and recreate, in light of the evidence, the world before the Fall of that first kingdom whose king received the crown “that came down from Heaven”—Adam for us, “Alulim” for the heirs of that lost world… all because of an apple!

8. Continuing with the topic, by way of introduction—and although a brief overview may seem irrelevant—Moses’ entry into Universal History revolutionized the structure of Humanity’s Future for many reasons. He was the first lawgiver to abolish human sacrifices. Once cleansed by Jesus Christ of the penalties associated with the biblical crime, the Mosaic Code of Justice remains the foundation of our social ethics, with its “Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not bear false witness”… the pillars upon which the Palace of Justice maintains its basic structure.

Obviously, the world remains as it is due to the battle to the death that the seed of Cain has been waging against Christ.

From the origins of the world—that world reborn from the ashes of the ancient pre-Christian world—the goal of kingdoms and empires, tyrants and dictators has been, and remains, none other than to legalize theft, adultery, crime, false testimony, unnatural sex, etc. The history of this struggle between the law of Nature—written by God the Creator in the hearts of all the first families of the Earth— and the law of Crime, whose goal was and is the legalization of that transgression (in the name of the State, the Caste, Democracy, and even God), had and has as its guiding principles the task of leading nations to the acceptance of war as a way of life.

The significance of the Code of Moses and its revolutionary nature need not be emphasized. As I have already said, that Code was the fire that raised from the ashes that Ancient World which, with the Quadrature of the Caesars, led Ancient Civilization to its ruin. Inspired by the Spirit of Christ, the Modern World arose from those ashes; today, it is once again galloping toward its ruin on the backs of the very same horses that led the Roman Empire to its downfall.

9. In many ways, then, the Revolution of Moses continues to affect us three thousand five hundred years after its inception.

Without in any way contradicting our Dogma on the Trinity, his monotheism remains the Rock upon which Christ built his Church. (From the opposition between that ancient force, stagnant in its inertia and refusing to take the leap forward, and the new force, which demanded to be born, arose the great conflict that, with its explosion, restored to Sacred Scripture the revolutionary nature it possessed at its origins—and which it never renounced. Thanks to Jesus Christ—even at the cost of being considered a “traitor to his homeland” for seeking to make Sacred Scripture the universal heritage of humanity—Classical Natural Intelligence found the door open to the study of Creation. And more importantly, Jesus Christ gave the Bible a People who would protect it from the impending Fall of the Roman Empire.)

10. The Jewish people, it is true, had carried the Holy Scriptures against the winds of the centuries. But they had done so as one who bears a burden from which one cannot free oneself. Their periods of idolatry, their eras of corruption—so common in their history—were nothing more than that: the manifestation of that inability to cast that burden from their shoulders. Moses signed a Covenant between God and the Hebrew people, whereby Israel would never be destroyed; but because this covenant bound both parties—and since the Eye of God is everywhere—it was bound to create, and did create, in the consciousness of the Jewish people the need not to feel watched in such a constant and omnipresent manner. The result of that need for liberation was those periods of idolatry and corruption of which the Bible is so full.

It was this relationship of a sadomasochistic nature—in that God knew it was impossible for man not to sin, and man knew it was impossible for God to refrain from punishing—that led the Jewish people to the final situation which, through their confrontation with the priestly powers of Jerusalem, Jesus Christ revealed to us.

After a millennium and a half of studying Sacred Scripture, living it in their very flesh—I would say—such was the model of the relationship between God, the Universe, and Man that Jerusalem and its children came to embody. Their liturgical rites, their legislative prescriptions, and the Jewish way of life in general—with few exceptions—kept the rest of the world’s hands away from Sacred Scripture, and those of the Jewish people—with rare exceptions—away from the books of the Golden Age of Philosophy and the Classical Sciences.

Jesus Christ set out to tear down this situation—this insurmountable psycho-historical wall in both directions.

And he did so.

 The need was vital. As custodians of Sacred Scripture, the Jews could not ignore that Universal History was continuing to evolve and that around them there was another people in whom God had entrusted another kind of “sacred scripture.”

If Sacred Scripture was the fruit of God’s love for humanity, the fruit of humanity’s love for Wisdom would be Philosophy, the mother of Science.

11. Science’s journey through the centuries was a long one. It could not have been otherwise. For since Man was created to share in creative Omniscience, human intelligence—a living reflection of Divine Intelligence—could not and cannot help but aspire to grow within the omniscient dimension that is natural to the Source of his existence. The direct and pernicious consequence that the Fall bequeathed to all the families of the world was this disconnection; thus, although man possessed “within himself the potential to be,” he found himself, after the Fall, unable to move from “potential” to “actuality”—what in Philosophy is called: moving from “potency” to “act.”

This natural impossibility gave rise to mythologies and cosmogonies—each one individually, and all of them collectively—which served as catalysts for the Crime against Nature, which, though bearing Divine law within its bosom, found itself powerless to reconnect the Human Creature with its Creator.

Ignorance was the lot of the human race (whose nature we will discuss in due course, though not here, as this book is intended to remain exclusively within the realm of knowledge of God as the Creator of the Heavens and the Earth)... Philosophical thought rose up against this ignorance, and although human intelligence was enslaved to the law of animal reason, because human beings carry within themselves the seed of divine intelligence, this seed, by the Creator’s design, was bound to bear fruit.

12. Thus, 1,500 years after the Nativity, the hour of science’s liberation had arrived. The guardianship that Theology had exercised over Science was coming to an end. However, the situation was not the same. One cannot compare the world 1,500 years after Moses with that of Galileo 1,500 years after Jesus Christ. But as far as the end of Theology’s guardianship over Science was concerned, the Hour had indeed arrived.

The hands of the clock of Time had been moving toward that Hour.

If theologians took offense at Galileo, it was not because God had ceased to be the spirit that breathes the breath of life into His creatures. I would say it was quite the opposite; it was because Theology had attempted to monopolize that breath of life and, having failed to do so, logically had to take offense at God. But these things had already been foretold. The real problem at the heart of science’s independence arose when, out of these tensions, emerged that sense of freedom felt by one who is finally liberated from the protection of a mother who is, as I would say, overly “Madonna-like.” This growing sensation, fueled by the critique of independent reason directed at a church anchored in its medieval ways, ultimately led the modern world to embrace various forms of scientific materialism.

Given the intellectual conditioning acquired by modern science, the progress of physical knowledge of the universe could hardly converge toward an encounter with its Creator.

13. Although it may sound like destructive criticism—which it is not—it is a fact that the failure of the Modern Age was written into its legacy to the Atomic Age. Many ideas about possible cosmological models, each a piece of a puzzle that seemed marvelous but that no one could put together. It fell to Einstein’s genius and his generation to elevate the Number to the status of the Word, and with its all-consuming power to order the Cosmos. (The madness that—according to them—resided in the genius led the sages of the Atomic Age to believe they were in a relay race and that their turn to run had come. With the scholars’ loyalty to a lost cause, the geniuses of the early twentieth century leaped onto the track leading to the hell of the world wars. By the time they realized it, by the time they wanted to stop the train, it was already too late, and inertia did the rest.) They leaped, and, like Pilate washing his hands, they stepped aside.

How could we fail to implicate them in the birth of the monster they nourished with the milk of the law of the strongest, and the bread of war as an instrument of progress and evolution!

Nourished by the doctrine of scientific materialism, the Nazi monster and the Bolshevik monster grew until they became the armies of that hell that made the 20th century the most evil period ever experienced by humankind.

True, the Fall of the Roman Empire was no less hellish, but the fact that the 20th century possessed all the necessary means to prevent the apocalyptic catastrophe, and the fact that it saw war as the only possible means to escape the ideological and economic crisis affecting all nations alike, transformed the Fall of the Modern World into the greatest tragedy ever known, both because of the number of souls caught up in the apocalyptic catastrophe and because of the hatred and evil unleashed in the world wars of the 20th century.

In other words, according to the gospel of the strongest: World War was legitimate.

They had to begin.

And they began

14. Fortunately for us, everything that has a beginning has an end, and the greatest of the wars experienced by humankind also came to an end.

It ended; but, fleeing the defeat of the Strong, the athletes of Science scattered in all directions, and handed the baton of atomic energy to the two great powers that had emerged victorious from the conflict.

The Cold War came into being.

A Cold War that had its origin in God’s decision to arm Cain and Abel with the same jawbone, in order to prevent fratricide through the fear of both being destroyed. A wonderful policy whose fruits we all now enjoy. Not that the Atomic Age is, or has been, a paradise of harmony, with “ ” thought focused on the salvation of nations and the redemption of Mother Earth. Not at all! But the technological revolution had to run its course.

And, by one of those marvelous decisions of Providence, the eyes of human intelligence were opened; they began to penetrate astronomical distances.

And as the universal expanse unfolded before the telescopic eyes of civilization, that “Universe of the Strongest” gradually evaporated, vanishing like the soap bubble that, according to its creators, it was. Stunned, with the incredulous eyes of one who sees his idols teetering on their pedestals, unable to bear the weight of the earthquake shaking the earth’s foundations, the last generations of the Cold War witnessed how Einstein’s religion and his cosmological doctrine trembled on their altar, and there was nothing their priests could do to prevent it.

Once again, Reality has rejected—and continues to reject—the ideology of scientific materialism. First, it rejected its gospel of the survival of the fittest; then it rejected its doctrine of the necessity of war as a biological instrument of civilization; and now it is shaking the very foundations of the Cosmos, as science tells us.

15. But rather than lose myself in a critique of scientific behavior, I prefer to move directly to highlighting the development of civilization as a result of the evolution of human language—that workhorse that has led us to victory over that lack of knowledge which the Son of God lamented, saying: “If you do not understand the things of the Earth, how will you understand those of Heaven?”

It is no rhetorical exercise to assert that the meaning, the objective, and the goal toward which these past two millennia have been moving have been the overcoming of that intellectual deficiency. Let us recall that God had spoken as a prophet, God had spoken as a lawgiver, God had spoken as a king and lord, and finally God spoke as a Father; but God never spoke to us as the Creative Intelligence of the One who, opening His mouth, said, “Let there be light.”

And yet, having affirmed that He created the Universe, within that affirmation lay the promise to do so. Thus, in the lament of the Son of God, this promise pulsed as the Future—a future that was yet to come, one He would have liked to see already, but which, unfortunately, was still to come.

For the intelligence of Classical Man would have to grow greatly to be able to comprehend the laws of the Science of Creation. The Path from barbarism to the dawn of our time would be long and narrow; but that Day would come. History would open its horizon, and the Morning Star, which heralds the arrival of the New Day, would shine its light upon the Fullness of the Nations.

16. Seeing it coming from afar across the centuries, one of Jesus’ disciples greeted it, saying, “The eager expectation of Creation is awaiting the manifestation of the glory of the freedom of the children of God.” Since all the Apostles of Jesus Christ were children of God, when Paul affirmed that “the whole of creation” was awaiting the “manifestation of the glory of the freedom of the children of God”—in his own way, in such an insightful way that Saint Peter recognized it, Saint Paul prophesied the coming of this Day when God would speak to us as the Creator of the Universe who revealed Himself at the beginning of His Book.

Moreover, the first two steps in this direction had already been taken. There were Revelation and Science.

Although it is true that a wall stood between the two, Christianity—as would be seen in the first half of the first millennium—tore it down, and in the light of its Magisterium, Theology and Science learned to coexist and grow together.

Obviously, civilization would still have to endure bitter and critical times; looming on its path were invasions, the schism among the churches, the battle between Faith and Reason, and, at the end of the two millennia, the World Wars. Only at the very end would the spirit of Intelligence enter the scene.

PART ONE

THE CREATION OF LIGHT IN GENESIS

CHAPTER 2

IN THE BEGINNING, GOD CREATED…

17. We now delve fully into the central theme of this book: the Creation of our Universe. And, to begin with—for it could not be otherwise—I have chosen Biblical Revelation as the path to discovering the Origin and Constitution of our Heavens and our Earth.

The mere fact that scientific thought has strayed from Revelation does not in any way legitimize the right to fabricate a Universe tailored to one’s own preferences. The legitimization of models of the universe—“provided that the sciences of numbers are used as building blocks in their construction”—is nothing more than a subtle way of privately acknowledging, without stating it publicly, science’s inability to even untie the thong of the sandals of the One who is the Origin of all sciences.

But could it be any other way? Having been born, so to speak, “yesterday,” do we presume to deny God so that our pride might be spared ruin?

18. Curiously, Theology, infected by the audacity of Scientific Atheism, was deceived by the imposture of 20th-century cosmology; and, sharing in the impossibility of accessing the Mind of God, it came to lead the Church to believe that the Creation Account of Genesis is nothing more than another metaphor devoid of any scientific content; that is to say, that the sole purpose of the Revelation of Genesis is to relate the experience of the universe to the Idea of a Divine Creator.

Thus, from here to promoting a constant “aggiornamento” of the Text, adapting it to the mindset and intelligence of the ages—well, why not!

It will always be more useful to the pride of the intelligentsia to deny its inability to measure up to the God who created the cosmos than to admit the impossibility of even coming close to the Creator of all the wonders that adorn the Garment of our Universe.

19. Some for one reason and others for another, the fact is that when we enter the realm of Creative Omniscience, we all do so as if treading on virgin territory. Whether some deny the existence of a God who created the Universe and the Cosmos, or others assert their inability to enter into the Creative Word through the theological device of treating the Narrative as a metaphor—beyond the beliefs and opinions of both groups—the Narrative of the Creation of the Universe has fulfilled its historical function of introducing humankind to its Creator.

In God’s hands lies the right to intervene in His own Creation; Revelation was given to expose the vanity of all natural intelligence. But since God does not take pride in mocking His creatures—especially since He has united Himself with His Creation as Father—and since Wisdom is the opposite of Ignorance, the literary body of Revelation bore the seal of the Almighty Promise of Access, in the spirit of Faith, from human Intelligence to Divine Creative Omniscience.

Rejoice, then, and let the river of the centuries carry into the sea of the Past the arguments that arose to mask the failure of all—scientists and theologians alike—to open the Door, enter, and see.

20. That said, bearing in mind the Thought of God, the Original Text of Genesis states that:

“The Earth was … formless!”

“In the beginning, the Earth was formless and empty,” is the complete phrase.

In the vast majority of translations of the original biblical text, especially since the days of Luther’s Rebellion against the Unity of the Universal Church founded by the Lord Jesus, the One Eternal King, the One Universal Pontiff, God the Only-Begotten Son, who through His Mighty Word brought into existence the Light, the Firmament, and all life with which Mother Earth was filled by her Creator, the words “The Earth was formless and empty” are not exactly the same.

And this is understandable.

Modern translators themselves found themselves trapped by scientific reasoning and, to spare their readers “confusion,” preferred to adapt the Word of God to the mindset of the times.

Here, completely independent of the complexities and prejudices of the times and their adaptations—since we consider God to be Eternal—I have chosen to retain the original text and work from its information:

 “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.

The Earth was formless and empty…”.

21. Now, the fact that the Earth underwent a geohistorical period characterized by planetary emptiness (as far as the biosphere is concerned) is as basic and evident a fact as the fact that we are born naked. From the perspective of classical geology, there is no mention of a historical period of “courtly” emptiness of the sort that the author of Genesis seeks to present to us. But even if we were to adhere to the criteria of modern geohistory, it would still not be correct to speak of a barrenness on the Earth’s surface in the image and likeness of what we see on the Moon’s surface. And it is precisely this kind of barrenness that the author of Revelation speaks of.

22. The Moon, for example; when speaking of the Moon, we can and do say “that it is empty.” For obvious reasons. There are no plants on the Moon; the Moon has no atmosphere; the Moon has no oceans; the Moon has nothing on its outer crust whose properties would allow us the luxury of asserting that the Moon had, or is on its way to having, a biosphere.

Regarding the Moon’s crust, in particular—aside from the fact that it is nothing more than an endless desert that, having nothing, lacks even the remains of some lost civilization buried in the folds of one of those Asimovian cataclysms so beloved by 20th-century readers—and regarding the Moon in general, we can and do affirm that “the Moon is empty.” With no atmosphere, no oceans, no continents, and no life of any kind—neither plant nor animal—the Moon is as empty today as the Earth was yesterday, before He, the Son of God, opened His mouth and said, “Let there be light.”

23. There is no need to insist, and insist again, on the geohistorical image from which the Word, opening His mouth, clothed the nakedness of Mother Earth with His almighty Word—the mantle of ice that He called “the Light.”

When, then, the Divine Author reveals to us that the Earth “was empty in the beginning,” the scientific image that its Creator, God the Father, wishes to convey to us is this: that of a supergiant moon called Earth. And it was to this planet in its infancy—"naked" and exposed to destruction—that God the Son drew near, to the wonder of all the children of God, "not of this Creation," and, opening His mouth, He began the creation of the human race.

24. Thus, and to broaden our horizons, the ladder of natural elements that Genesis invites us to climb places us before an Earth without oceans, without an atmosphere, without continents, without polar ice caps, without plants, without animals, without birds or fish. In a word, without a biosphere. And from this retrospective perspective, with all the calmness in the world, a man from 35 centuries ago asked all the sages of all times and places, those born and those yet to be born:

“Ladies and gentlemen, starting from that empty planet, as empty as the surface of the Moon: how did God create water, ice, air, earth, and fire? That is to say, the oceans, the continents, the atmosphere, the polar ice caps, plants, birds, fish, and all life.”

Ever since then, the question posed by the Author of Revelation has hung over the intellect of the millennia.

25. At this point, given the distance between the divine author and the 21st-century reader, the official answer—as voiced by theologians and scientists—is that Moses merely concocted a metaphor based on a rare kind of mystical hyperbole.

Personally, I do not know what to call a failure that denies the possibility of any victory, and in the assertion of Nothingness hopes to drown its defeat in the sea of oblivion. Perhaps one day I will find the answer. In the meantime, the primary task of this book is to demonstrate, contrary to Descartes, that God does not lie. The second is to show that the geniuses thought they were smarter than they actually were. And the third is to provide the correct answer to the question toward which Civilization has been moving: “How did God create the Universe?”

26. The necessity of having to start somewhere has led us straight to the relevant biblical account:

 “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.

The Earth was formless and empty, and darkness covered the face of the Abyss, but the Spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the Waters.

God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light.”

How many times has this account been read? How many times has this revelation been discussed? How many generations have tried to wrest its secret from it! And how many thinkers were honest with themselves and others and acknowledged that the IQ of the One who created these heavens and this Earth is as far removed from the human IQ as Hell is from Heaven?

(In this book, time will always be understood on a geological scale. Horizons will gradually open up as we go along. The Beginning is the problem. And the problem lies in the choice of the platform.)

CHAPTER 3.—THE CREATION OF THE EARTH

27. Biblical information places us on a specific geological platform. Specifically, Revelation spreads a geohistorical period out before us. If, based on its account (“the Earth was formless”), we look around and erase from the surface of the Globe all the classic elements of Nature—atmosphere, continents, oceans, and polar ice caps—what are we left with? We are left with an empty planet on the day before the Birth of its Biosphere!

But the point—toward which our intellect has been directed—centers on the search for the answer that so many efforts have failed to find. I mean: starting from a planet with those geological characteristics, with a primordial crust devoid of any natural elements with which to begin building anything—the image closest to its primordial state being the view of the Moon’s surface—starting from this primordial state, the question is:

How did God manage to create the biosphere?

This would be the traditional way of approaching the subject.

But there is another.

28. Let’s approach the subject from a new perspective. Why don’t we ask ourselves the question? Namely: What series of physical processes would we have to set in motion, control, and direct in order to create a biosphere, working with a similar geological foundation?

Seeing is believing! In the future, we will see God at work with our own eyes, and we will marvel as we behold how God performs His works. Speaking of these, His Son—while extending an invitation to us to witness the spectacle of Creation—amazed us by telling us “that His Father will do greater works than these.” From this we also understand that this invitation was the reason for the participation of the children of God in this work—the creation of our heavens and our earth; An invitation that reached its supreme fulfillment when, calling His children, He made them participants in our formation, and by saying, “Let us make man in our image and in our likeness,” the invitation was extended to participation in the act of creation.

That said, and so as not to lose our way on parallel paths—and since the Origin of our Universe cannot be seen by us except through the eyes of the intellect—it is with these eyes of the intellect that we will see how God created Light and all things.

29. It goes without saying that the restoration to humanity’s memory of a historical reality to which the human race was denied access will, by logic, clash with the cosmological systems that the modern world created to fill that void.

Regardless of the details regarding the origins of 20th-century cosmological systems—to which time was even assigned in nanoseconds to lend them greater virtual veracity—the emergence of the true historical system regarding the origin of the Universe is bound to overwhelm the intellect of all those whose thinking remains anchored in the ocean beneath whose waters the Modern World perished.

For my part, accustomed to navigating freely through the Knowledge of the Universe’s Memories, I always run the risk of moving faster than the reader can keep up with me. I am confident that I can overcome this problem. At least, I hope so.

I have sketched the geohistorical framework from which we will begin.

At the dawn of the First Day of Genesis, the Earth was empty, bare, without oceans, continents, an atmosphere, or polar ice caps. None of the natural elements clothed the Earth’s nakedness on the day after its birth. How, then, did God create the Biosphere?

How, if we had the Power, would we create it ourselves?

30. In fact, God created the Earth in Darkness, for the Author writes that, once the Light was created, God separated the Light from the Darkness; and then he says, “God created the stars to separate the Light from the Darkness.”

Hence the question: Where was—and where is—that Darkness “that covered the face of the Abyss” amidst which God created the Light?

This question will receive its due answer in due time. From what is written, it is clear at a glance that wherever that Darkness might have been—amidst which God created the Light—the Earth was not, in its Origin, created within the bosom of the stars of our Heavens. This is an early assertion advancing on the wings of dawn, but one that will be seen covering the firmament of the Century with the power of the Sun, driving Night away from Day.

One need only take paper and pencil, work through the information starting from the Beginning, connect Light with Earth, and one will encounter a revolutionary image in the fullness of its grandeur. There is still some way to go before this image is drawn.

Let us set out on that journey.

31. In truth, my task in this Introduction will consist of creating this painting, integrating it into the History of the Earth, and, starting from this picture, opening the Door of the Light of Intelligence to all the sciences.

Is there anything more natural than knowing where we come from!

For now, once the Sea of Stars of our Heavens has been placed on paper between Light and Darkness, Admiration is not only awakened but also opens our eyes to a Creative Scene bordering on disbelief: “The Earth was created on the other side of the Sea of Stars of our Heavens.”

But let the Light awaken us, open our eyes, and let the stifled “potential”—created to become “act”— this Vocation of an Intelligence born to grow in the natural Omniscience of its Creator, may it realize that Nature so very our own—lost because of a Rebellion drowned in the abyss of Ignorance, the mother of all Crimes, amid whose rivers of blood Mother Earth feels herself dying of shame and sorrow before the eyes of Heaven. For her sake I lift my soul from the dust, and may God turn our tears of horror at this unceasing hatred into rivers of joy that will never run dry.

32. As far as the intelligence of Creation is concerned, what father would not reveal his most intimate secrets to his children!

The Earth was created there, in the Darkness, on the other side of the stars of the Firmament. Yes, but why?

Seen from a distance, the Earth appeared in space as a planet with the very appearance of a moon-like satellite, only many times larger. An “empty” planet above that Abyss, whose face was shrouded in Darkness—how could one not feel bewildered!

Did her God create her only to abandon her in the Darkness? Where was that stellar spouse whom her Creator had given her to be her heavenly husband? From their birth, Earth and Sun had been betrothed in perpetual marriage; from their embrace, Life in the Image of God would emerge to the joy of all the stars. Separated from her planetary siblings, abandoned in the Darkness that shrouds the Face of the Abyss on the other side of the World of the Stars, with destruction closing in on her, her future hanging by a thread beneath a stone bridge—how could she not feel Confusion tearing at her soul!

33. Does God promise hallelujahs that drive one mad with joy, and once the birth is complete, turn His back on His creature, deliver it to destruction, and move on to something else?

Alas, the heart of the Earth, that tender heart whose hope is stronger than lightning and storm, surrendered to the perpetual solitude that precedes the disintegration of consciousness and reason. “Alas, my soul, which is breaking into pieces before the indifference of my Creator,” weeps the distraught Mother who has never given birth, and in her confusion feels she will never give birth.

The wedding was announced; she was chosen as maid of honor—beautiful as only she can be—that Moon who waits in silence with her bouquet of flowers for the arrival of her lady and queen, and soon finds herself abandoned in the Darkness....

34. “Empty and confused,” abandoned in the Darkness on the other side of the world of stars, the Earth shrinks, arms wrapped around her knees, awaiting Death. Already the “ ” surrounds her. Already she lets herself fall, drained of strength. The dream that heals all things, casting her out of Creation like a stone shattered by the sculptor’s blow, will carry her back to the dust from which her Creator brought her forth. The Earth breathes without breath. She lies down around the last spark of heat. It is Wisdom who, embracing her, covers her with a blanket and whispers words of trust and love into her ear:

“Hold on, my daughter; your Creator is coming.”

This was the scene; and this will be the platform from which we will begin to climb the ladder of the natural elements.

How I came to set this stage for a Cosmological Introduction will become clear in due time. In the absence of numbers, letters will do. And stimulating the intellect with words is like sugar in a child’s hand. Intelligence without Power is sterile, and Power without Science becomes a force of destruction. To claim that Man is the measure of all things is like a gun in the hands of a suicidal person; to deny the existence of God on the basis of Ignorance is to fuel the Genocide of Extinction. The reasons of the Creator of the Cosmos need no justification, and it is foolish for a creature to demand explanations from its Creator. He who can destroy a universe with a single word does what He does because He loves life; to be scandalized by His power and the reasons by which He determines that His creation follows one path or another is to use freedom to commit murder. It is not in the ignorance that stems from denial that the victory of science is found; and in the end, everything that rises must fall, and falsehood cannot reign forever while truth lives.

Let us continue, then.

CHAPTER 4.—CREATION OF THE BIOSPHERE

35. We have, then, two realities: the Earth on one side, and God on the other. The question here is how, starting from that “empty” geological platform, God created the Biosphere.

I said earlier that we could ask ourselves this question. For, as experts in the sciences of matter and its behavior, we could always propose a geophysical sequence that comes as close as possible to the actual historical model. And I said this because this is the very same problem that God faced and had to solve. And He did solve it. There is no need to dwell on this or overemphasize it. The results are plain to see and fill everything the Earth contains.

36. The fact is that “because He knew the answer,” God solved the problem of the creation of the biosphere starting from that seemingly formless geological structure. And He knew the answer because He knew all the equations that the geophysical equations presented to Him.

With perfect knowledge of those equations and their solutions, God rose, took the stage, opened His mouth, and spoke His Word: “Let there be light.”

37. We are speaking of the fusion of the external geophysical body. And here we could venture into describing a fusion by fire from the outside, or else bring to the fore a fusion caused by compression from the outside in, as if the gravitational field were collapsing in on itself until its radius was reduced to the absolute minimum.

If Ignorance still kept us enslaved to the Wall of Death, the choice would be open. This is not the case, and consequently, I’ll get to the point.

38. The first step God took to bring about the fusion of the geophysical body was “the increase in density per astrophysical cubic unit of the Earth’s gravitational field.” The immediate effect was as follows:

Immediately, the Earth began to rotate on its axis at an ever-increasing speed.

Under the gravitational pressure generated—just as a gust of wind imparts accelerated motion to everything on the edges of its path—the Earth began to rotate on its axis at increasingly higher speeds.

This was the first effect.

39. With regard to the fundamentals of this nature of the gravitational fields involved in a specific three-dimensional space, such that density can increase or decrease in accordance with the law of energy transformation—and since this nature of the fields lies at the root of the relationship between universal energy and astrophysical matter—Creation could not have come into being unless God possessed infinite knowledge of that cosmological relationship underlying the expansion of the cosmos and the construction of universes.

The transformation of gravitational energy into material physical forces—electric fields, light, cosmic energy, and so on—is, in effect, the main pillar upon which the entire edifice of Creation bases its structure. We shall see in what follows what this relationship implies and signifies.

40. Consequently, from a state of zero rotation—which is natural for any astrophysical body whose core is on the verge of collapse—the Earth began to rotate on its axis at an ever-increasing speed. God calculated this rotational speed according to necessity; the kinetic energy of the Earth’s body had to correspond to the gravitational density per astrophysical cubic unit that was to produce it.

This correspondence between the gravitational density of a field and the thermodynamic parameters of astrophysical bodies is one of the fundamental laws governing the behavior of Cosmic Matter.

41. This, then, was the first stage of the geohistorical sequence in the Origin of our Biosphere.

The fusion effect of the external geophysical body—the mantle and crust—in response to the activation of the Earth’s astrophysical core was immediate.

Let’s see if we can step into the painting and, from within the canvas, feel the Movement that—because it is Memory—hangs as a decorative object on the Wall of our Universal History.

Since we know that the matter that reacts directly to gravity is astrophysical matter, and by tracing the effects back to their cause, we understand that the kinetic parameters of a stellar body stem from this correspondence with the properties of the gravitational field in which it is located, we can open our minds to the rotational acceleration of the Earth’s Core as an effect of the increase in the Density of the Earth’s Gravitational Field that God set in motion.

42. Once this activation of the Earth’s astrophysical core was established—through which the geonuclear transformer began generating natural physical forces within its body, namely electromagnetic forces and heat— the seismological pulse of the internal geophysical structure surged, with both the Earth’s Mantle and Crust experiencing in that very moment the natural effect of their subjection to the process of expansion of the physical Core unleashed by God, on the one hand, and their thermal elevation, on the other.

43. Like the roar of the king of the jungle upon awakening, like the echoes of the first lightning bolts of a storm, like a star on the day of its implosion, like an earthquake of astronomical proportions shaking the Mantle beneath which the Core had been sleeping—both the Mantle and the Crust began to heat up and crackle amid a symphony of earthquakes and volcanoes.

The spectacle of the awakening of that giant lying asleep at the heart of the Earth transformed the Earth’s surface into a sea of molten lava, shaken by a volcanic process of indescribable power and beauty.

Like a soldier who obeys his king and lord and, at the battle cry, leaps to his feet, grabs his sword and shield, and without a moment’s hesitation throws himself into combat, roaring with the voice of a volcano, and with the power of legs that trigger earthquakes, makes the ground crackle beneath his feet—in this marvelous way, in a few geological hours that “formless and empty” Earth became an ocean of molten lava, beneath whose currents an army of volcanoes seemed to move, battling the magmatic waves of a mantle that had broken through the outer barriers and was joyfully surging across the Earth’s surface. Tidal waves—gigantic lava tsunamis—shook the Earth’s surface; from their crests, islands of magma were hurled into the stratosphere, where, as they cooled, they turned to rock and fell back into the ocean of fire with the roar of a meteorite or a comet.

CHAPTER 5.—MELTING OF THE CRUST

44. We see, then, that by drawing conclusions from what is observed—just as inertia itself suggests—and by proceeding from what is known to the consequences to which the facts lead, there is no room for inconsistencies, although it is true that the one who possesses something does not usually appreciate what another loses; it is by following this line of thought that the physical answer to the biblical enigma sets in motion a geophysical sequence whose main stages are:

1: Fusion of the Primary Crust

and 2: Sublimation of the resulting Proto-Atmosphere.

45. The driving force behind this geohistorical series was the Core. God produced the energy necessary to bring about this change of state by accelerating the Core’s rate of operation; this revolutionary acceleration was, in turn, the result of the increase in the Gravitational Density per Astrophysical Cubic Unit of the Earth’s Gravitational Field.

In practical terms, comparing the Geophysical Body to a Machine, let us say that God filled the tank (Earth’s Field) with energy (Gravity), thereby causing the automatic elevation of the Geonuclear Engine’s parameters to the Critical Point of Astrophysical Implosion.

The fact that this Critical Point was not exceeded is evident from the effects caused by the sublimation of the proto-atmosphere, which in turn gave rise to the polar ice caps—without which the biospheric system would never have come into being, and whose disappearance would entail its irreversible collapse.

Thus, once the Primary Crust had transformed into a sea of molten lava, its shores stretching from one pole to the other of the Globe, and the (Primordial) Proto-Atmosphere had risen to the very ceiling of the Planet, the geonuclear body began to slow its rotational speed per geological unit of time.

46. It was already noon when the gases produced by the crustal fusion had accumulated around the globe and given rise to a planetary atmosphere—primitive, yet containing within its volume all the elements necessary to give birth to our biosphere.

That atmosphere continued to grow throughout the morning, and as the hours passed, it began to conceal beneath its rarefied volume the sea of magma that had given rise to it. (Always speaking in broad strokes, roughly speaking, in general terms, focusing on the whole rather than the details.)

These events took place during the Morning of the First Day. There was still an Afternoon ahead.

47. Taking into account the mechanics of the fusion of solids—a lesson for young children that has been taught in all classrooms since ancient times, and whose core we will skip, omitting the intimate knowledge of crystalline structures and the manipulation to which they lend themselves in both chemistry and physics— and understanding that it was this elementary mechanism that God applied to the Earth’s Primary Crust, we can affirm—without fear of falling into the absolutism of the all-powerful reason of science, and even less into the Nobel-esque trap of academic dogmatism—that the dynamic stabilization of the external geophysical structure of that Primordial Earth arose as a consequence of the decline in seismic activity within its inner core.

Let’s say that the Force God used to play with the Earth as if it were a set of volcanoes with which to compose a unique, spectacular, marvelous, and mind-blowing symphony—and after having drawn sparks and thunder from the cymbals, whether because He had grown tired and could go no further, or because He had shattered the drumsticks—the fact is that the Force subsided, and silence fell. In layman’s terms:

48. Following the law of inertia, once the energy causing the fusion of the Primary Crust had been transformed and its work completed, the Earth’s Astrophysical Core returned to the state of equilibrium it had been in before the moment God opened His mouth and spoke His Word: “Let there be light.”

Thus, as the silence grew thicker—until it matched the density of the Primary Atmosphere thus created—the volcanic red and yellowish color of the Primary Crust began to fade, to subside, and to take on the color of solid volcanic matter. And so, as it entered the evening of the First Day of Genesis, the Earth began to return to its natural state of equilibrium among the different parts that make up its geophysical body.

49. The final stage of this process (the creation of the Primordial Atmosphere) was the sublimation of a proto-atmosphere whose primary chemical composition can be compared to that of the “gas” planets whose evolution was not subject to this special event, though we must not overlook the unique phenomenology to which God subjected the formation of the Earth’s Primary Crust—a matter that will be addressed in due course, as the rhythm of this Introduction dictates.

Therefore, and to continue, once the Earth was isolated from an external energy source with which to engage in an “energy chat”—to use everyday terms—the Earth’s core, as a result of the transformation of the gravitational field into mechanical forces, entered a dangerous trajectory of astrophysical collapse (a topic that will also be addressed when appropriate and relevant. What matters are the facts, and the fact was that:) During the transition from the “state of massive fusion” to the “state of geophysical equilibrium,” the Earth’s crust solidified, and as a result, the proto-atmosphere entered a phase of sudden sublimation.

50. By the time night fell on the First Day, to put it simply, the proto-atmosphere had transformed into a mantle of ice.

This mantle of ice covered the Earth from the North Pole to the South Pole, and it was the Light spoken of in Genesis.

Roughly speaking: from Fire to Ice.

CHAPTER 6.—CREATION OF THE PRIMORDIAL ATMOSPHERE

51. Naturally, I have gone through this First Day as quickly as possible, with the aim of building on a solid foundation. I did not want the reader, without knowing what I am talking about, to get lost in the attempt to understand the idea I am outlining.

The fusion of the Primary Crust and the sublimation of the Primordial Atmosphere—these were the two main processes that God brought about during the First Day.

(The time factor remains unknown. I will not be the one to put numbers on the time God took to carry out each process.

For reasons we’ll explore, my advice to the reader is not to worry too much about it either. Above all, because God is omnipotent, and once power is defined in terms of the relationship between force and work, one of the things within the Creator’s power is to accelerate a process to its maximum possible extent.

When I speak of omnipotence, I understand it from this perspective. Logically, matter sets certain limits, both upper and lower.

I also take this for granted).

52. But what did God do to trigger the accelerated rotation of the Globe at the origin of the fusion of its geophysical body?

All right, “God said, and it was so.” I’m the first to couldn’t care less about how He did it or how God does what He wants to do. The fact is, having been created in His image and likeness, looking the other way and not worrying about an answer—without which my being would feel unsatisfied—is not my style. It’s not enough for me to simply believe. I mean, that’s more than enough, but if I can see—and since it turns out I have eyes to see—then seeing is even better.

So I insist: What force, capable of bringing about such a series of geophysical processes, did God set in motion to trigger the accelerated rotation of the Earth in that way?

 What God accomplished at the dawn of the First Day was to generate an energy field. (We will see that the Divine Nature and the Essence of the Creative Spirit are found in the substance of this statement: “God is Energy,” a field we will have time to explore further.) In fact, as our understanding gradually opens up to the contemplation of the Uncreated Nature of the Divine Being, we will see how creative energy transforms into the natural forces acting upon the body over which the Creative Act is taking place.)

The first thing, therefore, that God did at the dawn of this First Day was to generate a field of energy. And the second was to project that field of energy onto the Earth.

53. I was saying that the first thing God did at the dawn of this First Day was to generate an energy field. And the second was to project that energy field onto the Earth. And I declared that God is Energy; and that His physical manifestation occurs through His transformation into the nature of the field of the object onto which God projects His force. In the case at hand—the Earth—the energy field that God generated was transformed into gravitational energy.

54. To put it more vividly—so as not to get lost in calculations that are very slow due to their scientific complexity—I will say that the Earth’s gravitational field absorbed that river of energy and doubled its average density per astrophysical cubic unit. This happened on one side. On the other side, God doubled the original density of the Earth’s gravitational field based on the estimated calculations He had made to bring the Earth’s Core to its Astrophysical Implosion “ ” Point, the effect of which implosion would be the fusion of the Primary Crust.

The immediate consequence of the multiplication of energy per astrophysical cubic unit to which the Earth’s gravitational field was subjected was to produce the effect of accelerated orbital rotation that the Earth began to undergo.

(As we proceed, it will become clear to what extent the rate at which gravitational energy is converted into mass and heat, and the rotational speed of the celestial body in question, maintain a relationship similar to that of any machine with the fuel it needs to operate.)

55. I know—I imagine that, when approaching the subject at this pace, comparing the gravitational field to a fuel tank that fills up and empties doesn’t seem like it’s going to get us anywhere. But that is what happened: the Earth’s automatic response to the increase in the average density of its gravitational field was the instantaneous acceleration of the rotational speed at which its Core had been moving up to that point. And the Core’s response to the increase in its working rotational speed was the production of heat.

(On a more superficial level—or with less depth—most people have at least a general idea of what the end product of the fusion of solids is. I say this in reference to the fusion of the Primary Crust. Volcanoes are the best example I can call upon. The association between volcanic eruptions and masses of gas rising into the sky is a classic phenomenon of nature, and the photo spares us from having to navigate through crystalline lattices and their molecular bonds—a pleasant journey for some, but quite tedious for others. On an industrial scale, blast furnaces offer us another example free of charge. But if our goal is to gain a thorough understanding of the subject, it’s best to consult an expert in the natural sciences and ask how solid matter manages to stave off the worst; after all, the behavior of crystal lattices subjected to a rising heat source is a ubiquitous topic in even the most basic physics textbooks.

56. The questions that are giving us a headache here are the following:

What was God trying to achieve by revving up the engines of the geophysical transformer to the max?

What was He aiming for by accelerating the rotational speed of the Earth’s Core and causing the fusion of the Primary Crust?

(The other issues I have left open—the chemical nature of the Primary Crust and its formation—are details I will attempt to address later when I reach the chapter on the Creation of the Earth. At that time, I will also endeavor to explore the astrophysical nature of the Core and the relationship between stellar matter and gravitational fields, which underlie the properties of the cosmos. Pointing out, as I have done, that this energy-matter relationship translates into light and heat is not a baseless idea, but simply the most natural and straightforward way to explain the basic process by which stars and galaxies originate and according to whose phenomenology they distribute themselves and interact. But since a promise is a promise, I hope to return to this later; and if I do not, I hope the reader will excuse this psychological quirk that affects me when it comes to “paying my debts.”

57. Let us return, then; let us pick up the thread and follow the path that the Light marks out for us in the darkness of the tunnel.

I was saying that once the Core was activated—due to the pressure caused by the increase in the gravitational density of the Earth’s field—the transformation of energy into heat preceded the fusion of the geophysical body. And I then asked what God hoped to gain from this fusion.

Based on the depiction of the fusion of the Primary Crust, the answer is as follows:

 God was seeking to produce a chemically predetermined atmosphere. In other words, the ultimate effect that God produced by pressing the accelerator of the geonuclear transformer had its North Star in the Primary Atmosphere.

(In this section, we will omit everything related to the mathematics of flight control from the initial state to the final state. The logic of the victory achieved implies, in its structure and development, the overcoming of a complex system of unknowns. Given the results at hand, it would not be fair to risk losing the thread based on specific considerations “suitable only for geniuses.”

But it would be good to make it clear that the reward for navigating that sea of equations was the future itself. Any error in doubling the gravitational density per astrophysical cubic unit beyond a critical point would have caused the geophysical system to transform into a sort of planetary supernova. In that case, the Earth would have disintegrated into a swarm of meteorites. But let’s return to the topic at hand.

58. I was saying that, once Noon of this Day had been reached, the Earth found itself enveloped in an atmosphere supersaturated with one of the most abundant elements in outer space: hydrogen. In all other respects, the Earth’s atmosphere was similar to the atmospheres of the other planets.

In terms of color, let’s say that the Earth went from the black and white typical of the Moon’s surface to the bright, vivid red of solar flares—only in liquid form—only to eventually fade and cool until its surface vanished into the heart of a thick cloud, as enveloping and enigmatic as a nebula orbiting an imaginary field at the cruising speed of a Christmas comet.

Let’s just say…

And let’s leave it at that.

CHAPTER 7.—THE CREATION OF LIGHT

59. And we continue.

I hope you've been able to follow my train of thought this far, and that the speed at which my mind has set out to recreate the Memories of our Universe hasn't caused you any trouble.

Let’s continue, then.

Once the Earth had transformed the energy supplied to it by its Creator into natural forces within its geophysical system, and the geonuclear implosion had triggered the two mechanical processes described in the architecture of its body—the Fusion of the Primary Crust and the Production of the Primordial Atmosphere— once this initial sequence had taken place, the geonuclear engine gradually slowed down until it reached a new state of equilibrium.

60. This process can be traced in physics textbooks. In fact, one need only reverse the sequence—slowing the Globe’s rotational speed, as well as the Planet’s temperature—and the rest is child’s play, though it must be said: child’s play, yes, but for children intellectually capable of seeing the interplay of forces that constitutes the System of Creation, in which God enters as the “universal source of energy,” and where the gravitational field manifests itself in accordance with the classical principles of energy—that is, it transforms, in this case, into the natural forces acting on a specific astrophysical body. This transformation lies at the root of universal motion and makes possible the existence of both specific astrophysical systems—whether open or globular—as well as structures on the scale of galaxies. Not surprisingly, always taking the Word as a source of inspiration, a truth that will become clear as we proceed when we delve into the creation of the Firmament, God speaks of Gravity as those “waters … that are above the Firmament…,” thereby opening our Creator’s understanding to the comparison of Gravity with the liquid element—a reality to which He Himself is accustomed, which is natural to Him—and from this reality: Gravity = liquid fuel, He works. Certainly, Gravity is a “singular liquid energy,” but this will be examined in greater detail as we proceed.

61. Thus, once the extra multiplication of the original volume of the gravitational field—which God brought about by saying “Let there be light”—had been transformed into the work involved in the fusion of the external geophysical body, and once the fusion of the primary crust and the geological mantle had been completed—this series of events concluded—the rotational speed of the Earth’s core slowed down, and as it slowed, it dragged the planet’s overall temperature down with it.

The two immediate consequences of the temperature drop throughout the entire geophysical body were:

1: Formation of the lithosphere

and 2: Sublimation of the atmosphere.

62. I’m reiterating what I said earlier. My habit of treating these processes as part of my Living Memory leads me, out of habit, to skip over sequential stages that, in the eyes of others, might not be so obvious.

Let me explain.

If I said that the speed of rotation and the rate at which gravity is transformed into light and heat are directly related, and I now say that the Earth’s rotational speed began to slow down, it follows that this slowdown affected the Core. As its rotational motion fell in a vertical descent—once the supplied fuel had been consumed in the process of transforming gravity into heat—the overall geological temperature began to drop. First that of the Core, then that of the Mantle, and finally that of the Crust. A consequence of this cooling would be the formation of the lithospheric ring and the sublimation of the Atmosphere. We will discuss this sublimation next.

63. And once again, speaking of the Fusion of the Primary Crust, I emphasize the fundamental nature of knowledge regarding the fusion of solids as a starting point for understanding the change in the crystalline structure that occurred in the Earth’s structure as a result of the Fusion of its primary geophysical body.

In this regard, the existing artificial preconditioning—universally prevalent—regarding the natural origin of the planets is a barrier the reader must overcome. That archetypal image for the uninformed—who still grope blindly through the tunnel of the 20th century’s embarrassments—where Gravity, magically emerging from Nothingness, compresses a sea of floating matter pulled from the hat of the Merlin of the moment, and abracadabra, produces a physical entity, this image, as it emerges from the discourse itself, fits right into a tale of Alice in the Land of Science Fiction.

And that’s all.

64. Any self-respecting intelligence working within a system where astrophysical values are determined by the relationship between matter (star) and energy (gravity) reaches the conclusion—taking astro-iconography as a reflection of Reality—that the temporary cooling of stellar bodies causes nebular matter to settle on their outer surfaces, this being the Natural Origin of the Planets.

In the case of the Origin of Planet Earth, its Cosmic Singularity stems from the fact that its Origin is a direct Application of Creative Intelligence to the matter-energy system—a subject we will address in due course—and this determined both the primary geophysical parameters and the geohistorical effects deducible from said Creative Application.

Here we might ask ourselves why God did not simply limit Himself to working with a planet of natural origin; a question that will be answered as we proceed but which involves theology, since it concerns the “Why,” whereas the “How” is the domain of the physical sciences.

65. Returning to our main topic:

Gas sublimation refers to the transition of matter from the gaseous state to the solid state without passing through the liquid state. Nature provides us with the most common example of gas sublimation every winter. Clouds transform into snow and hail.

At the level of home experiments, the scope for experimentation is very limited, but at the laboratory level, there are numerous experiments open to exploration. Since we lack the space and resources here to illustrate these concepts with images, I will conclude by saying that:

The Mantle of Ice into which God transformed the Primordial Atmosphere—the star of this First Day—was “the Light” of Genesis.

66. And here I leave my readers to reflect on the most incredible mystery of mysteries: how could a man from three thousand five hundred years ago have formed such a modern physical conception of the Origin of the Biosphere?

A. Fusion of the Primary Crust,

B. Formation of the Proto-Atmosphere,

C. Cooling of the Crust and Sublimation of the Primordial Atmosphere.

Isn’t that mind-blowing?

This is a point I should hammer home, I think—or at least that is what I should believe. I imagine we will have time to return to this matter of the cognitive relationship, as described in this Introduction, between Moses’s thought and the content of the hieroglyphic text we call “Genesis.”

67. In any case, Moses the Hebrew’s relationship with Universal History did not unfold via the bridge of Science but rather along the rails of Omnipotence and All-Power, leaving Omniscience—understood as Science—to God, the true Author of this Hieroglyph, human hands being nothing more than pens moving to the rhythm set by the Thought of the One who stands before Eternity and sketches Events onto the canvas of the Millennia with the same ease with which others plot their crimes in full view of the world. Two matters, then: Omniscience and Omnipotence, distinct courses, which will be served in due time according to the rules of good table manners.

PART TWO

CREATION OF THE FIRMAMENT OF THE HEAVENS

CHAPTER 8.—

GEOHISTORICAL RECAPITULATION

68. The surprise at discovering this sequence of geohistorical events—which the geniuses of the modern world judged to contain nothing but the feverish and fanatical imagination of a mind in a state of religious delirium (a sequence that is perfectly scientific in its approach and development)—must not divert our attention from the complete series of facts that I have touched upon only briefly in order to facilitate a general overview of the whole.

Let us recapitulate:

69. One: Controlled Multiplication of the astrophysical density per cubic unit of the Earth’s gravitational field. The origin of this Controlled Multiplication, I said, is the Nature of the Divine Being.

70. Two: Vertical acceleration of the working revolutions of the Earth’s geonuclear transformer. From this derived the rotational acceleration of the Globe around its axis and the astrophysical implosion of the Core, which is the source of the Planet’s heat.

71. Three: Global thermodynamic elevation of the geophysical body, which extended from the Mantle to the surface and produced the Fusion of the Primary Crust.

72. Four: Liquefaction of the Primary Crust under the effects of the fusion of the outer Globe and the formation of the Primordial Atmosphere.

(The chemical nature of the Earth’s atmosphere—unique among those of its planetary family—presents us with an alternative problem that I will not address here, but to which I will return in due course.)

73. Five: Once the thermal transformation of the gravitational fuel was complete, the Earth returned to the hands of Nature, with its new changes conforming to the law of inertia.

A. Deceleration of the geonuclear transformer’s operating revolutions.

B. Decrease in the planet’s rotational speed.

C. And a decrease in the Globe’s temperature.

These were the first three visible effects.

74. Six: These three effects triggered a new sequence of effects. The first of these new effects was the cooling of the Globe’s outer surface, which ipso facto laid the foundation for the creation of the outer geophysical ring, the lithosphere.

75. Seven: We can also speak of the solidification of the Secondary Crust. In short, this is a matter of preference. Once we delve deeper into the subject, we will have time to distinguish between them. Moving the discussion forward a bit, let’s say that the Lithosphere is to the Globe what the Secondary Crust is to the Lithosphere. In short, the Secondary Crust is the outer layer of the Lithosphere. It was, therefore, the Secondary Crust that was the first lithospheric layer to solidify.

76. Eight: The continuous drop in geophysical temperature back to its original starting state—a state it would never again reach—caused the solidification of the Secondary Crust, as I have said, and the formation of the lithospheric ring. The Geophysical Architecture continued to complete its structure with the formation of the second ring, the Mantle, whose cooling would shut off the heat source from which the Primordial Atmosphere had until then been drawing energy to maintain its natural state.

77. Nine: The cooling from the outside toward the interior of the Globe logically had to transform the lithospheric ring into a barrier preventing the transfer of heat from the Core to the Atmosphere.

78. Ten: Thermally isolated from the Core, the Atmosphere’s temperature plummeted at the dizzying speed imposed by the insulation. Its volume froze. The result was the transformation of the Atmosphere into the Mantle of Ice that covered the Planet’s spherical surface from the North Pole to the South Pole during the Evening of the First Day.

As I said before, this Ice Mantle is the Light in the Word of the First Day.

79. This is the sequence we have joyfully explored. Along the way, I have highlighted specific facts that demonstrate the stature of the Creative Intelligence and its mastery of the sciences of space, time, matter, and energy—a cognitive mastery that is like a field in which the Tree of the Science of Creation takes root. We will pause for a moment to reflect on these facts in the next section.

CHAPTER 9.—FIRST LAW GOVERNING THE BEHAVIOR OF THE UNIVERSE

80. God applied to the geophysical system the first of the laws governing the behavior of the Universe: the transformation of gravitational energy into light and heat. Since this first law is the general principle upon which God has built the Architecture of the Heavens, it is thanks to its manifestation in local space that the geometry of our Universe remains constant over time. I know it is a bit hasty to make such a bold statement, but as we proceed, the picture that the results presented here seek to convey to our minds will gradually unfold, revealing the magnitude of its beauty in full color.

81. That being said, the application to the geophysical system of the first law among the set governing the Physics of the Heavens leads us to examine the reactions that stellar bodies with diverse properties set in motion when faced with the same external factor—such as the sudden influx into their system of a stream of energy, akin to an intergalactic gravitational string that, as it crosses the abysses, sweeps up all the loose matter in its path.

82. The explanations we may arrive at will always have this Historical Event (the multiplication of the gravitational density of the Earth’s field) as their starting point. Its implications are what lead us to formulate the relationship between universal energy and astrophysical matter within the framework of the production of light and heat—the two most direct visible consequences that reach our senses. When I speak of the production of light, I mean the entire spectrum of stellar radiation at the root of cosmic energy. The importance of this relationship between gravitational energy and stellar matter will be revealed in the following chapters. For now, I will stick to the facts, always taking the multiplication of the original density of the gravitational field as the starting point for this New Cosmology.

83. We have observed (and this has been done because the first cause has been inferred from the final effects) that, when the astrophysical cubic density—that is, the amount of energy present in a gravitational field, in this case that of a planet, and more specifically that of Earth—is doubled, the heat production of the astrophysical transformer is multiplied by that factor.

If we were talking about a stellar transformer, the first visible consequence would manifest itself in the intensity of the light produced.

In the case presented to us by our Creator, heat is the direct consequence based on the nature of the transformer on which God worked.

(The range of astrophysical transformers is beyond our imagination. Within the horizon that opens before us, it is reasonable to assume that this range includes sources of gamma rays, X-rays, and rays of a nature that is indefinable given our limited understanding of the Cosmos. And, after all, how could we dare to set limits on that which has no end!)

84. The questions are: What would happen if, instead of God controlling the process of transforming the energy of an astrophysical system into light and heat, we found ourselves at the frontiers of the Heavens and, for some external cause, a binary or multiple star system were to experience an uncontrolled increase in the density of its gravitational field? And conversely, what would happen if the rate at which the gravitational field is transformed into light or any other type of radiation source exceeded the rate of energy transfer from one system to another? Wouldn’t we have to begin revising our hypotheses about the origin of novas and supernovae?

85. Here’s another one: Aren’t the fluctuations in the intensity of starlight and the variations in their orbital periods and cycles a call to our intelligence, intended to open our minds to the idea of the universe as an ocean of energy upon whose waters matter floats?

Isn’t it wonderfully curious that, speaking of Himself and recalling those days, God told us, “who was hovering over the surface of the waters”?

Personally, I have no doubt whatsoever that the universal gravitational field can be identified as an ocean of energy where currents flow, acting as channels that transfer gravity from one area to another, and through this irrigation system, God maintains the geometry of His Creation in a perfect state of balance.

 But the question I raised earlier concerns the relationship between our universe-galaxy and the outer cosmos, the realm of the galaxies.

86. The question was: What happens when an extralocal current bursts in like a whirlwind at the perimeter of our Heavens and throws a zone out of balance—whether due to the multiplication of the total energy present or to the instantaneous acceleration of the rotational speeds of astrophysical matter?

Through this overview, the idea is to recreate the effect of accelerated rotation that the Earth experienced when God multiplied the density of its gravitational field—an effect from which we derive a law of direct proportionality between the process of heat production and the rotational speed of the astrophysical transformer.

This idea leads us to see that, when a star is subjected to instantaneous accelerated rotation, the resulting effect must be, in sequence: the creation of a nova, or a supernova if the body affected by the instantaneous multiplication of its rotational speed is a multiple system.

In due course, we will also examine this process of nova and supernova formation in detail.

CHAPTER 10.—AND THE WORD IS GOD

87. And now we pick up the thread that our Creator has laid out before us—a thread that has always been there but which, in His Prescience, He left lying in darkness until the Intelligence of our Civilization opened its ears to the Language of the Science of Creation. That said, we can summarize the sequence of historical events in which God played the leading role during that First Day as follows:

A: Multiplication of the density of the Earth’s gravitational field. (This matter of God multiplying the energy volume of a given astrophysical system—a matter that lies at the very foundation of Creation itself—is one we resolved by positing the nature of the Creator Himself, a nature that allows Him to be the fundamental source of energy from which the cosmic ocean draws.)

B: An upward increase in the operating rate of the Central Geophysical Transformer. (The existence of an innate correspondence between gravitational density and stellar rotation underlies light and its intensity.)

C: Fusion of the Mantle and volcanic liquefaction of the Primary Crust. (I will refrain from commenting on this, as I have entrusted to the reader’s natural intelligence the connection between the primary cause noted and the final effects described.)

D: Formation of the “classical” Primordial Atmosphere. (By “classical,” I mean the typical planetary atmosphere—rarefied and chaotic—as found on the other planets in our Solar System.)

E: Cooling of the Core and solidification of the Secondary, or Lithospheric, Crust.

(This was the origin of the Secondary Crust. As it cooled, God acted upon it, overseeing the formation of the Autonomous Ecospheric Substrate, about which I have not yet spoken, but which will be discussed later. In short, there are the mid-ocean ridges as evidence of the drag forces that God set in motion; their solidification marks the moment during which God shaped the geography of the continents.

The most basic logic dictates that a semi-liquid state is the perfect moment to remove part of the material from the surface of a semi-solid body, just as someone who works with clay does and then places the resulting figure in the kiln. In this case, the “kiln effect” was provided by the accelerated solidification process that the Secondary Crust had begun.

Why God split open the Atlantic hemisphere is part of the Geophysical Architecture underlying the Creation of the Biospheric Plane, about which we will say what is necessary shortly.

The fact is that the drag forces that created the Atlantic Channel and gave rise to the oceanic ridges left their imprints as the lithospheric layer solidified. And there they remain as testimony to the existence of the creative activity shaping the continental shelves.

I do not wish to comment on how this creation affects the theory of plate tectonics. In addition to the Theory of the Biospheric Plane, I will present further evidence against the geophysical model that the 20th century imposed as the norm.

F: Sublimation of the Primordial Atmosphere. (I said that when the lithosphere isolated the primordial atmosphere from the Core—driven by the drop in temperature—the atmosphere froze, sublimated, and the final result was its transformation into an Ice Mantle, which, just as the sea of lava had done before, covered the Earth’s sphere from the North Pole to the South Pole, from East to West.)

88. This Ice Mantle that enveloped the planet on the afternoon of that day was the Light that came forth from the lips of our Creator when He said, “Let there be light.”

 And so it was done. And so it was.

The opposite would have been absurd.

Descartes’ doubt, as a method of relating the Creator’s Intelligence to that of the creature, is not a method; it is a wall of separation, a barrier that limits the possibilities and capacities of science to grow toward Creative Omniscience.

If by Omnipotence I previously understood the creative power to reduce the duration of a process to its absolute minimum, I now understand Omniscience as the dominion that God, in His Wisdom, exercises over all the sciences of matter, space, time, and energy. And in doing so, I include in this list sciences that operate in different universes, about which we can say nothing except to marvel at His infinite knowledge.

CHAPTER 11.—CREATION OF THE FIRMAMENT

89. Thus, considering the state of the Earth at the end of the First Day, with the geophysical globe enveloped under that Mantle of Ice that its Creator calls “the Light,” from a distance the view of our planet was that of an immense ball of ice floating in the Abyss, like the sight of a massive cosmic egg born in the Darkness.

 The next geohistorical sequence that God had in mind was as follows:

90. The Earth’s movement from its region of origin to its final place in the Heavens.

(Locating the region of origin of our Earth will be a problem to be resolved in the coming chapters. The need to warn the reader about the skepticism that this location will arouse prompts me to do so. I will also face this challenge with grace and composure.)

91. Launch of the Earth into the Solar System and entry into its third orbit.

92. Sublimation of the Ice Mantle. (By sublimation of ice, we mean the transition of matter from the solid to the gaseous state without passing through the liquid state. In this case, it would be the reverse process of the sublimation of gases.

If on the previous Day we saw how God managed to lower the Globe’s temperature to the critical point of sublimation of its atmosphere, on this new Day we will see the opposite process. My advice is to open the eyes of your intellect and prepare to comprehend wonders. And as always, if any objections arise, there’s no need to worry too much—everything will be resolved.)

93. The Ice Sheet breaks into two blocks and retreats toward the geographic poles. (This retreat of the two ice blocks toward the polar ice caps is a geohistorical period that, approached from a different perspective, classical geology has imprinted on everyone’s mind.

I recall here that Science is the ABCs of the Language of Creation. The other approach—attempting to mold the Universe and its History to fit the omnipotence of human Reason—is an exercise in vanity about which I will say nothing now.

Science, just like Theology, has remained to this day subject to the bondage imposed by the Necessity of the Fall. It is not from a platform of accusation and condemnation that we should analyze the theories and intellectual states through which both Faith and Reason have passed. Had we been trapped in the shoes of any one of those who came before us, we would likely have done exactly what they did. So on this joyful day, let’s not get too serious).

94. Birth of the Ocean and Formation of the Biospheric Atmosphere. (This Atmosphere is the Firmament in the Word of the Second Day. We will soon enter into its geohistorical sequence. Before the dawn of this Second Day breaks and History draws one step closer to us, I think it’s not a bad idea to reflect on the place where God created the Light. I know that more than a few of you are going to throw your hands up in horror and be left speechless. Well, you just have to open the Gospel and see what His Son was doing to be amazed by the surprise).

PART THREE

CREATION OF THE LADDER OF NATURAL ELEMENTS

CHAPTER 12.—ON DARKNESS

95. The biblical text does not lie. On the Fourth Day of Genesis, we are told that God created the stars to separate the Light from the Darkness. I quote:

“And so it was. God made the two great luminaries—the greater to rule the day, and the lesser to rule the night—and the stars; and He set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light to the earth, to rule over the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness.”

Who hasn’t read this passage at some point?:

“God created the stars and set them in the firmament of the heavens to separate light from darkness.”

The author of Genesis first tells us that God created the Light, and then immediately states that once the Light was created, He separated it from the Darkness.

96. Well, the options presented to us are what they are and leave no room for interpretation. God created Light, then separated it from Darkness, and created the stars to separate Light from Darkness. The question is: what would happen now if, where Moses wrote “Light,” we were to substitute the Mantle of Ice, whose creation we have traced?

Is the atmosphere starting to heat up?

How about we grab a pencil and paper and draw some lines?

We draw a circle in one corner of the paper and call it Earth.

On the opposite side, let’s draw another circle and call it Darkness.

Now let’s draw a dividing wall in the middle between Earth and Darkness, which we’ll call Stars.

This is the image we get when we place Earth where Moses placed Light. And, in fact, if we look up at the sky, we see that the Heavens act as a dividing wall between Earth and the outer cosmos.

97. Conclusion: If God created Light and separated it from Darkness… then the Earth was at that moment in the region from which the stars currently separate it. In other words, before creating Light, the Earth was in the midst of Darkness.

98. I understand that this simple way of constructing logic may seem to the reader like a sinister art of complicating matters even further. The truth is that, no matter how hard I try, I cannot find the complication, and perhaps this is why I venture into the reconstruction of geohistorical events without regard for the opinions of the ages. When it comes down to it—which is what interests us here—the problem is where, in what region of outer space, that Darkness was located that covered the face of the Abyss when God said, “Let there be light.”

99. Revelation simply informs us of the astronomical distance that God placed between Darkness and Light. It gives no numbers or intergalactic coordinates. It tells us that God created the Earth, and between the Earth and its region of Origin, He placed the Heavens. A marvelous and revolutionary interpretation that leaves us glued to our seats and places us exactly where our Creator wanted to see us: in the midst of Darkness and gazing up at the Heavens. So what good is it to have our feet on the ground if, in the end, the one with his head in the clouds is the one who sees things most clearly?

100. An additional question comes to mind.

Did God create the stars to separate the Earth from its region of Origin for no other reason than to trace the zodiac on the vault of the heavens?

Or did He give the heavens galactic dimensions for some other reason?

An affirmative answer implies the assertion of a historical impossibility: nothing less than that a man from three thousand five hundred years ago would have understood—without ever having observed the cosmos—that our universe is a galaxy at the heart of an ocean of moving galaxies, which is why God gave our heavens their current astronomical dimensions.

CHAPTER 13.—THE LADDER OF NATURAL ELEMENTS

101. But let us continue.

Once Light was created (a process we have described by following the timeline with which God has challenged science throughout the ages since Genesis; by following this timeline, we have reached the Fusion of the Primary Crust and the Sublimation of the resulting Primordial Atmosphere, the process by which God produced the Mantle of Ice that, during the Morning of the First Day, covered the spherical form of the planet Earth—and without delving into the mechanical processes, given the natural nature of the subject: Fusion of the Primary Crust and Sublimation of the Primordial Atmosphere—we left the matter of Revelation somewhat up in the air until the occasion allowed us to set our feet back on the ground.

102. And without going into further detail, we returned to the Text; upon reading its words, we agreed that the definition of the Creative Word—by virtue of whose identity it departs from the realm of metaphors, hyperboles, myths, and other legendary entities—made “the Light” a Champollion Key, the use of which interprets Revelation contrary to every theological or scientific opinion held to this day, stating that God separated the Earth from its region of origin and brought it into the Heavens—a conclusion inferred from the Text: “And God saw that the Light was good, and separated it from the darkness,” a statement which, in the light of this interpretation, leads me to admire the courage shown by the human author when he dared, without scientific knowledge, to make such a declaration of the separation of light and darkness by the hand of God Himself, who created the Earth and the Heavens.

Moses’s ignorance is precisely where the wisdom of the One who dictated the text to him lies, and through his silence, his scribe became the wisest man of his time. In a section dedicated to Moses’ ignorance as God’s scribe, we will return to the topic of the Lord’s omniscience, who dictated to him the account of the creation of the universe. How could it be otherwise? Or did it not all begin for us when the Earth was created?

103. We already know that some say the true history of humankind dates back even before the Earth existed. However, neither the existence of humankind is of transcendental importance to the cosmos, nor is knowledge of the structure of galaxies vital to the existence of humankind. Thus, if humankind did not exist, the cosmos would still be where it is, following its course; and if humankind did not know the structure of the cosmos, that would not prevent humankind from being what it is.

This does not mean that knowledge of the Universe is not of specific existential value to us; rather, it makes clear that the knowledge of vital importance to humankind as a Being is the Knowledge of God; and since the Creator is found in God, the Science of Creation comes as part of the package, so to speak, with joy in the body.

104. Some may ask why, then, God has kept the Memory of the Creation of the Earth and the Heavens in Silence, separating the Creator in God from the Lord. This is the stance God maintained in Christ, keeping Faith and Intelligence like two arms united to the same body, born to obey the same Will, yet the movement of each arm subject to the thought of the head, under whose impulses the entire body moves.

 And I will answer this simple question by affirming that this is indeed how it has been.

At the same time, I will deny that from the beginning God had ordained the Knowledge of the Creator within Himself to follow this pattern of growth under the conditions of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. What happened, happened, and there is no remedy now. And because it happened, the formation of Intelligence in the image and likeness of that of our Creator encountered a setback along the way, which compelled God, in effect, to prioritize the knowledge of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil over the knowledge of the Science of Creation—whose fruit, as we know, is war.

105. I do not know if the reader of these lines has grasped the laws of this Science. For my part, I believe that the nature of that Fruit is understood, and from the knowledge that comes from experience, I can write what, with the knowledge that comes from theory, took shape in the language of the First Man, namely, “Cursed be anyone who eats of that fruit, and cursed be the one who gives the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil to eat.”

A final confession that brings me back to the point from which we began this brief journey, speaking of the Separation of the Light that God carried out once He had created it in the Darkness. Writing about this, I said that while Ignorance had its Law, the impossibility of penetrating its essence led some—theologians—and others—scientists—to return to God His Genesis, wrapped in the fabric of metaphors and myths.

But now that the Light has been translated through the Mantle of Ice that, at the end of the First Day, covered the Earth’s surface—a Mantle of Ice produced by the Sublimation of the Primordial Atmosphere arising from the Fusion of the Primary Crust— we have no choice but to set fire to the paper of theological tradition and twentieth-century cosmology, blow on the ashes, clear the table, and get back to work based on the information God provides us in His Book.

I may return to this subject in another section, and I may have already done so in a previous one.

It doesn’t matter.

And I’m not saying this because I’m one of those who believe that a truth is more or less true depending on how many times the hammer falls on the head of the fool of the moment. I say this because I believe that life is a thought that creates itself from universal roots, and not because having a dream many times makes that dream more meaningful, nor because if the body stops dreaming, it will lose the benefit provided by a night’s rest.

Not at all!

106. For while man’s insignificance to the Cosmos is a fact, Truth exists in and of itself, even if no one else exists in the Universe. I may cease to exist right now, but the truth existed before me and will remain without me.

107. As for my habit of returning to a particular point of reflection—which may be one today and another tomorrow—it stems more from the need to maintain a common point of reference between writer and reader.

By inertia, the essayist tends to lose himself in his thoughts, and the reader tends to cling to a specific idea.

And given the complexity of the matter at hand, no matter how much I might wish to present it in simple terms, the fact is that setting aside cosmology and theology—and their stance regarding the Book of Genesis—from the workbench upon whose surface the spirit of God’s Intelligence is moving in this 21st century presupposes an act more closely related to art than to science, assuming that writing is an art, and that giving expression to thought is an art—something I personally do agree with, and which I deduce from the philosophers and heroes of the revolutions of the second millennium, the former honing their pens with the art of the polemicist and the latter their swords with the art of the philosophers.

The two times this union bore fruit, it brought into the world two Events for eternity: the French Revolution and the Russian Revolution.

108. The problem, then, lies not in the Word but in the application of the art of its science. In this case, Truth—not Power—is the Beginning and the End. And hence, since man is insignificant and Truth is eternal, human opinion is dust on the table. Whose surface we have cleared in order to place the Earth in its proper place on the Day when God created the Light, and once created, “separated it from the Darkness.”

109. Returning, then, to the point of restoration, I will say that anyone with two eyes in their face will see that, once the Light was created out of the Darkness—the Earth being the Mantle of Ice that covered its surface at the end of the First Day—the Earth was in Darkness.

From that region God separated it once the Light was created—that is, the Mantle of Ice that covered the Earth’s sphere at the end of the First Day—as it has been written for three thousand five hundred years: “And God saw that the Light was good, and He separated it from the Darkness.”

If He separated it, it is because it was there. And if God later created the stars to separate the Light from the Darkness, as we read on the Fourth Day: “God made the two great luminaries—the greater to rule the day, and the lesser to rule the night—and the stars; and He set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light to the Earth, to rule the day and the night, and to separate the Light from the Darkness.”

110. Thus, by translating “Light” as “Mantle of Ice” in this Line of Moses’ Hieroglyph, we find that the Earth was located in a Region outside the Heavens. A stunning and astonishing translation—and were it not for the fact that it is God who authorizes it and His Scribe who writes it with the Rod of Command He used to part the waters of the Red Sea, our minds would be transported to the world of extraterrestrials, and where I write “C” for Cosmology, I would have to write “F” for fantasy.

That being said—because it deserves to be said—and since the door is now open, let’s go in.

111. As for how God brought about this shift from a region of General Space to the region where it is currently located, the author said nothing on this matter. Nor did he say anything about the specific nature of the region of origin where God created the Earth. Nor am I going to go into further detail at this time. When the time is right for this cosmology, we will lift the veil. For now, it is enough to accept that God created the Earth outside our Heavens, beyond the constellations of our galaxy, in the Abyss shrouded in Darkness.

112. In fact, returning to the topic of the Formation of the Secondary Crust and the Sublimation of the Primordial Atmosphere, the fact that the Earth was located in a region subject to absolute zero served as the catalyst that God used to create the Mantle of Ice.

We see how, since Mars was farther away, its atmosphere did not undergo the process of sublimation that the Earth underwent. The uniqueness that the Biosphere represents among the planets points to the existence of a special geohistorical period, which—as incredible as it may seem to us—is revealed in the Revelation when God declares that the uniqueness of the Biosphere is a response to and stems from the region of origin where He created it. This spontaneous assertion immediately leads us to the problem of the Power of the Creator of the Universe. For, while intellectually speaking the process of the Biosphere’s creation reveals its scientific nature in the sequence outlined above, the insurmountable objection concerns the Nature of that Being who not only conceives how to do things but also possesses Infinite Power to carry them out.

113. I don’t know if I’ve said this before, but if I haven’t, I’ll say it now: Power without Intelligence does not satisfy the need that the transformation of Reality demands; and conversely, Intelligence without Power remains in dreams, in fantasy, in answers that are carried away by the wind.

In this case, knowing God through Theology and the Universe through Science, all we have to do is merge them into a New Science—the Science of Creation—and follow its laws and principles.

In this case, knowing that exposing an atmosphere to a region subject to absolute zero would cause its volume to sublimate and give rise to the creation of a block of ice—and being able to do so—God did it.

And He called the Mantle of Ice “Light.”

114. But God prepared the Earth’s integration into the Heavens before opening His mouth and initiating the creative sequence of Light. It was no matter of chance that God found a star system with planetary characteristics compatible with Earth. Before plunging into the ocean of the Milky Way constellations, God knew what He was looking for, where to find it, and what the characteristics of the Solar System He was seeking were. And He knew this because He Himself formed its planetary structure with the aim of preventing any rejection of the Earth’s integration into the solar system.

115. Genesis builds upon a prior foundation: the Earth and the Heavens had already been created, and we have set out to navigate across their surface. We could have begun this journey by plunging into the depths of Time, but I have chosen to follow the path designed by God in advance—among other reasons—because He knows the terrain better than we do. In due time, I will take up the cause of attempting to recreate the Creation of the Solar System. Until that time comes, we must lay out the basic laws necessary for understanding a systematic sequence of such great interest to us.

116. Thus, the integration of Earth into the Solar System—however natural it may seem to those who associate Divinity with the power to simply speak and have everything done—involved solving a sea of complex equations, replete with unknowns and factors to be taken into account. Like any other system in the Universe, the solar body cannot accept the integration of a new element without itself undergoing a transformation of state. Keeping in mind this simple universal rule governing the integration of astrophysical bodies into complex systems, God ensured that the Solar System could not reject or be destructively disrupted in response to the Earth’s integration into its structure by creating the Sun, Earth, and Moon from a single Origin in space and time.

117. Once the Sun and the planets—with their moons and rings—had been created, God proceeded to isolate the Earth, the root of the “Confusion” referred to in the Text, so that, after creating the Light—as we have already seen—He could reunite the Earth and the Sun, the moment around which we are focusing in this section. This integration followed a specific path. And along that path, the ice sheet was to begin its own journey toward its transformation into Air and Water. Describing this journey is the goal we will set for ourselves in the next section.

118. And, in short, the consequence of the Earth’s launch onto the northern trajectory (the gateway through which the Earth entered the Sun’s electric field) made itself felt on the surface of the ice sheet. The fact that the Earth entered its biospheric orbit via this northern path had causes more complex than those we wish to address here. For now, let us focus on the melting of the Ice Mantle and the physical consequences of its acceleration to the maximum critical point over the duration of the process. This instantaneous elevation was intended by God when He granted the Earth access via the northern path.

119. The truth is that by guiding the Earth along the Solar northern path, what God achieved was to accelerate the process of the Ice Sheet’s thawing to the maximum permitted speed, as well as to do the same with the consequent evaporation of the resulting product.

The interplay of forces through which the melting of the Ice Mantle accelerated to its maximum possible rate combines classical forces with revolutionary ones, and points to that elusive quantum cosmology at the origin of all processes of astrophysical matter creation and electromagnetic energy generation.

The closer the Earth and Sun came together—the shorter the Sun-Earth distance became—the more intense the process of thawing the Ice Mantle became. It is the rapidity of this approach that leads us to speak of sublimation. In this sense, the sublimation of the Ice Mantle was a direct evaporation. To understand it as simply as possible, we can compare it to applying a red-hot iron to the surface of an ice bar. The Sun acted as the red-hot iron bar in God’s hand, and the Earth as the ice bar.

I am not speaking figuratively when I say that if God had continued to apply the iron indefinitely, the entire mass of the ice sheet would have been transformed into the atmosphere. At least, that is the impression created by the infinite scope of the subject. I would say it is merely an illusion and nothing more. An illusion that invites us to take another step forward and affirm that the stability of the universe in general—and of our solar system in particular—rests on two fundamental pillars. We have already seen the first: the transformation of energy into new forms of energy. The second is the electrodynamic nature of fundamental cosmic matter.

CHAPTER 14.—SECOND LAW OF THE BEHAVIOR OF THE UNIVERSE

120. God’s study of the behavior of Cosmic Matter led Him into the realm of Astrophysical Electrodynamics. During the research into the nature of space, matter, and time that God conducted in His quest to master the Science of Creation—which would enable Him to transform Universal Reality—God observed how fundamental c e matter, despite its transformations and dimensional leaps within general space, retains the properties of its atomic nature.

The discovery that the natural atomic properties of fundamental cosmic energy are conserved, regardless of the direction of travel, opened up a boundless creative horizon for God. For if, no matter how great the distances traveled during the leap from microcosmic to macrocosmic matter, the nature of its electrodynamic forces is conserved, the scope that opens up to creative intelligence is unlimited. Moreover, this discovery alone transforms the stars and their systematic networks into building blocks, into a field of raw material from which to extract all the mass necessary to erect constellational structures.

121. Therefore, applying this now: if the first law (the transformation of the gravitational field into light) opposes the contraction of the universe to infinity—since the amount of energy does not remain static in the equation, an equation-based instability arising from the transformation of gravity into light and electromagnetic forces— a stability condition required by the hypothesis to allow the contraction of the universal field into a primordial nucleus—a condition that is not met, a fact demonstrated by the stability of the local astrophysical system; this second law—the electrodynamic nature of gravitational fields—blocks the opposite movement (destruction by dispersion) by establishing an electrodynamic network of behavior among the celestial systems.

That is to say, the operation of this law of transformation of gravitational energy into electromagnetic forces and other forms of light energy—the operation of this law, as I was saying, against dispersion caused by the constant weakening of the volume of universal energy—maintains concentration through the laws of electrodynamics.

122. And finally, the activation of this electrodynamic protective barrier allows for the existence of gravitational currents around astrophysical continents governed by a theory of molecular structures in which the particles are celestial bodies.

123. We see the visible application of these two laws to an Individual Stellar System in our own.

On the one hand, the magnetic field serves as a link between Earth and the Sun. This applies to all the other planets as well.

On the other hand, the electric field erects a barrier between the Sun and Earth. Poetically speaking, we could sum this up as follows: As Earth was hurled toward the impossible encounter of its destruction, the nature of its positive spirit transformed the appearance into admiration when the equality between the signs resolved the conflict.

And we continue.

124. In relatively simple terms, I will recreate the first part of this new geohistorical sequence that took place on the Second Day.

But returning to the subject, the Sun’s incorporation of a new planet meant that its System had to integrate into its field a new transformer of gravitational energy, with its unique properties. How this structural change altered the relationship among the planetary family is not easy to determine, but this was a factor that God knew from experience, and based on that experience, He resolved all the unknowns on paper before taking action. One need not look far to find evidence of the success of applying his mathematics to reality; the results are plain to see. We will focus on Earth and what its integration into a shared gravitational field meant for its physical body.

125. I’ll begin by saying that any astrophysical body, as long as it is isolated from any other body, is limited to consuming its own energy. While the Earth was isolated in its region of origin during Day Zero, it was drawing energy from its own gravitational field. The low rate of transformation at which its core was operating kept its pulse at a stable minimum of revolutions. The problem was that the gravitational field continued to increase the Earth’s mass through its black-hole effect. So the Earth had good reason to be confused.

126. And God says it was empty because the Earth could not, on its own, escape that situation. Only by being connected to an energy network could it overcome the fate toward which, left to its own devices, it was headed. When God returned and doubled the energy of His field, accelerating the rotation of its outer body, He broke that situation. From this, as I have shown, resulted the fusion of the primary crust and the creation of the Ice Mantle that covered the Globe at the end of the First Day.

127. Once the supplied energy had been transformed into heat—and with the Core having returned to a new state of equilibrium at the end of the First Day—when it was introduced into the Solar System at the dawn of the Second Day, the Earth suddenly found itself in the same situation as a transformer connected to a power grid.

The first reaction of its Core was to shift from a slow operating state to a more advanced one.

We can understand what this means by recalling how the variation in the energy with which its field can interact affected it at the beginning of the First Day. From this effect, it follows universally that the engine that maintains constant stellar motion is the Core.

128. The motion of the stars and of all bodies in the Universe, then, as is clearly seen in our Solar System, has a distinctive feature. They all rotate on their own axes. The natural physical effect of this type of motion is, as seen in helicopters, upward movement. From this we should deduce that all stars and their systems follow an upward trajectory. It is as if we were saying that the Universe behaves like a body moving upward eternally. Now let us return to the point where I left off in this Narrative.

PART FOUR

CREATION OF THE BIOSPHERE

CHAPTER 15.—CREATION OF CONTINENTS AND OCEANS

129. I was saying that God created the Earth in darkness, and that, having created the Mantle of Ice—which He calls “Light” in His Book—He separated it from the darkness and placed it in the heavens, where it remains.

And I believe I said that the first of all the effects the Earth experienced as a result of this integration can be compared to the effect a transformer experiences when it is integrated into an electrical circuit. And that, just as at the beginning of the First Day, at the beginning of this Second Day the increase in the Globe’s rotational speed—an external sign of the rise in rotational speed experienced by its Core—was the immediate effect of the Earth’s integration into the field of the Solar System.

130. Now, since the natural path between two points that attract each other is a straight line, and since motion in a gravitational field is similar to that of a liquid in a glass, the approximate motion of an external body toward an astrophysical body due to this relationship traces a circle around the star. But since God ruled out the option of approaching along the planetary path, the trajectory the Earth was to follow could only be a parabola. And that was precisely the path it began to trace in response to the instantaneous acceleration its rotation experienced. This pertains to the first stage of the Earth’s flight in search of its biospheric orbit.

131. Regarding the first effect described—the law governing the flight of helicopters as depicted by pencil—we must incorporate the nature of the respective electric fields into this coupling process. That said, any electromagnetic field is defined by its two components: the magnetic force acting at a distance between bodies and the electric force that positions them around a reference nucleus. In the case of the Earth’s launch, we have the magnetic force in action, in combination with the law of rotational motion. The description this combination provides of the Earth’s approach to the Sun is what draws a parabola from outside the Solar System toward the Sun’s north pole as the access route.

132. The activation of the second electromagnetic force—the electric force—created an inversion band at the event horizon as the Earth indefinitely approached the Sun.

Once inside this band, in response to the equality of the electrical signs between the respective fields, the Earth’s trajectory began its descent toward its biospheric orbit.

(Regardless of the equations governing the mass of astrophysical bodies subject to a systemological relationship, the energies at play between the component bodies of a Solar-type stellar system, and the distance traveled by a planetary body during its orbit, the sequence of effects that Earth experienced during its trajectory of approach toward the Sun resulted in the reheating of its Core—an effect that gave rise to the series of thermonuclear waves at the origin of the Mantle’s thermodynamic state).

133. The effect resulting from the transformation of the Mantle—something we already discussed when speaking of the Creation of the Ice Ring—into a thermonuclear reaction mass was the fusion of the Lower Lithosphere.

(The Lower Lithosphere refers to the zone of geophysical contact with the Upper Mantle. Recall that the division of the Earth’s body into three main zones, with their intermediate contact zones, is not a mere whim of nature. The zone that has come to be called the Outer Core belongs, within this structure, to the contact zone between the Core proper and the Mantle. Given that the Core is the stellic body around which a planet forms, and is therefore the Transformer of Gravitational Energy into heat, the physics of the Outer Core corresponds to the state of matter in the Lower Mantle, which would be equivalent to that of a mass surrounding a microasteroid at a low temperature—that is, compressed matter in a gaseous state— although this state is not appropriate for describing the physics of the band within which the Core oscillates, causing—as I have already stated elsewhere—the flattening of the Globe through its oscillation. But let us return to the main point:)

134. Under other circumstances, the heating of the Upper Mantle—or thermonuclear reaction mass, the source of Global Geological Volcanism—would have had to reach the Upper or Outer Lithospheric Ring, but the fact that the Lithospheric Ring lies beneath the Ice Sheet—whose creation we observed at the beginning—kept the structure of the Lithospheric Crust in a solid state, although the Secondary Crust was subject to the physical effects of rising temperature within a pressure cooker. It is understandable that the temperature inside that pressure cooker—into which God had transformed the geophysical body—could not continue to rise indefinitely.

135. Our geologists determined the physics of the Earth based on a cold, mechanically inactive Core, alive only through the thermodynamic reaction dependent on gravitational pressure—in this case acting as solid pressure. They needed a virtual model from which to explain the constancy of the geophysical heat that determines lithospheric volcanic activity. The fact that wave-based imaging revealed a thermodynamic structure on the table ranging from lower to higher—that is, from the outside in—served to validate the childish model of geonuclear heat driven by mass pressure that they had preconceived in their minds; a childish model that, in turn, went to bed with the hypothesis of the origin of stellar matter from a concentration of dust at the heart of a gravitational field drifting through the stellar seas... you can’t cross the sea without it flying... blah blah blah... The reader will excuse my infinite cynicism.

136. And as they made love, they magically gave birth to an Ecosphere governed by Perfect Equations which, of course, by contradicting the Origin from Chance, logically had to seem suspicious to them—and, consequently, had no chance of thriving. And they preferred to cling to the childish model rather than continue searching for a geophysical model capable of explaining the thermodynamic equilibrium of the biosphere.

137. How, however, can a planet without a heat-generating source remain hot for millions of years—to the extent that, as the fossil record demonstrates, one can speak of an Ecospheric Thermodynamic Cycle— this is a point that, once the childish model of “Matter Pressure as the Origin of Geonuclear Heat” had been elevated to the status of dogma—and because they had no hypothesis with which to replace it—they chose the ignorance of one who prefers the evil he knows to the good he has yet to discover. And hence the challenge presented in this New Century by a theory in which the core of every planet becomes a stellar body, transforming gravitational energy into heat.

138. We were saying, then, that the release of geonuclear heat (as a result of the Earth’s entry into the Solar System)—which was accumulating between the crust and the mantle—would, if it found no outlet, eventually cause an astronomical explosion, which would mean the disintegration of the geophysical body. In other words, and to get to the heart of the matter: without destroying the lithosphere, God had to break up that enormous block of ice beneath whose mass the thermonuclear reactions building up in the mantle threatened to shatter the core. The solution lay in the gravitational pull that the solar magnetic field would exert on the geophysical body as the Earth crossed (in the direction of its geostationary orbit) the interaction zone between the respective electric fields.

139. The origin of the chain of thermonuclear reactions that keep the mantle active is a subject to be studied from the perspective of the Geophysical Architecture we are developing. For example, how a chain reaction can extend its wavefront to the lithosphere and open pathways through which magmatic heat is released. Another issue is the relationship between the Core and the irregular geoid shape of the Crust. This issue leads us to view the oscillation of the Core within the Mantle as the origin of the bulge in the equatorial region. And consequently, to introduce between the outer zone of the Core and the inner zone of the Mantle a geophysical ring in a chromospheric state, the peculiarity of which I will not discuss here.

140. To recap, we saw that, once the Earth was propelled toward the Sun, our planet crossed the interaction zone between the respective electric fields, which triggered the natural electrical reaction between two fields of the same sign. (The same operating law that determines the stationary orbits of particles around an atomic nucleus based on electric fields is the law we must apply to the structure of the Solar System. Although it seems too simple to be true, we will shortly demonstrate that the planetary configuration obeys the laws of electrodynamics. The Earth’s orbit is a natural consequence.)

141. And it is curious that, having noted the similarity between the structure of an atom and the Solar System and the resemblance between intra-atomic forces and systemological electromagnetic forces—as obvious as it was—and because they refused to believe that Nature and Creation obey such logical principles, twentieth-century scientists refused to believe what was right before their eyes; and, with the answer right under their noses, they rejected it as unworthy of their genius, preferring to delve into a Theory of Unification of electromagnetic and gravitational fields—a theory that, nevertheless, finds its daily miracle in the structure of atomic matter. For if the origin of geonuclear heat stems from material pressure, how is it possible that this very pressure has not caused the entire planetary mass to sink into the Sun’s body over the millions of centuries the Solar System has been active?

142. They respond by citing centrifugal energy, but they ignore the fact that work cannot be performed indefinitely—orbital constancy contradicts this—so, having to seek a different force, they embarked on the search for a unified field; and while they spoke of electromagnetic forces, they did so by eliminating the electric component of the magnetic field. True scholars indeed!

Therefore: With the Earth’s trajectory directed toward its stationary orbit due to the electrical repulsion between fields of the same sign, in terms of work we can compare this effect to that of an accelerated centrifugal force. In fact, subject to this effect, had the magnetic field not mitigated the consequences, the Earth—swept up by the electrical storm—would have been flung into Mars’s orbit, for example. The gravitational pull produced by the interaction between the respective magnetic fields, when the Earth crossed its designated electrical band within the Solar System, served as the brake that anchored it in its orbit. This pull affected the Lower Lithosphere, tearing the bases of the great mountain ranges from the Upper Mantle. With this action of lifting the roots of the great mountain ranges—the action of the hammer against the ice bar beneath whose ring the Lithosphere lay—was already complete. To replicate this global seismic action would be to open a door in time and dare to stand firm amid an earthquake with its epicenter in the Core, whose universal radius of extension causes the entire body of the Earth’s crust—planted upon the Ring of Ice—to dance beneath our feet.

 (The scholars of the 20th century certainly found evidence of a retreat of the ice; what they never dared to dream was that the body of ice that retreated, once upon a time, covered the entire sphere of the planet. How its Creator managed to split that Ice Bar is the point addressed in this section—a subject on which there is a world of things to say—and we will have time to delve into its mechanics, the Origin of Ecospheric Orography, at all levels, throughout the course of this 21st century).

With the Ice Mantle—which God called “the Light”—thus cracked, the heat accumulated within the inner geophysical body found an outlet through which to escape: in the form of gases and lava, and through this process God brought about the transformation of ice into water. This is the sequence of events in the origin of Water and Air. But let us recall how the Ice Mantle reacted to the Earth’s approach to the Sun.

PART FIVE

CREATION OF THE ECOSPHERE

CHAPTER 16.—SUBLIMATION OF THE ICE SHIELD

143. There are two ways of doing things. One is to let the law of time take its course, and the other is to accelerate the development of an action using the means at hand. Subject to the law of time, the Ice Mantle would have responded to solar energy by melting; it would have split in two, and over time the two ice sheets would have retreated toward the polar ice caps. The waters of the first great ocean would have evaporated. Slowly but surely, the ocean would have divided to multiply; from the oceans, the seas would have emerged... But God knew a faster way to bring about this global process.

Why melt the Ice Mantle at a low temperature when He could, through integration via the boreal route, produce the effect of red-hot iron against a block of ice? We call this effect the sublimation of ice. The immediate effect of the Earth-Sun encounter under the conditions described led to the accelerated sublimation of the Ice Mantle. Solar energy acted like red-hot iron applied directly to the surface of the Mantle. This sublimation caused the Ice Mantle to break into two large blocks and led to the birth of the Biospheric Atmosphere. (When I say “conditions described,” I am referring to the access parabola, which caused the Earth to be, for a time, at a distance closer than its natural distance in its stationary orbit.)

144. I have already stated that the solar gravitational pull resulted from the opposing effect that propelled the Earth toward its biospheric orbit. And that, as a result of this pull—arising from the magnetic coupling between the two fields—the bases of the great mountain ranges were completely released. Perhaps “uplift” is the correct term. This release was driven by the heating of the geophysical structure. Let us recall that as the Mantle cooled, the lithospheric ring solidified, leaving the contact plate fused into a single body. When the Earth entered the Solar System, the Core heated up, the diameter of the Mantle expanded, and thermal pressure created natural waves of expansion moving from the center to the exterior of the geological body. This movement was not sufficient to propel the mountain ranges against an outer lithosphere enclosed beneath an Ice Mantle which, while sublimating externally, remained in its original state internally.

145. The solidity of the Ice Mantle resulted in the accumulation of heat within the Earth. This accumulation began to cause widespread seismic activity that, originating in the Mantle and through uninterrupted series of thermonuclear reactions, heated the Crust, opening pathways for the release of heat— —that threatened to disintegrate the entire structure. The fusion between the upper layer of the Mantle and the lower layer of the Crust, fractured in this way by thermal pressure, began to lift the bases of the mountain ranges, around whose massifs the geonuclear heat found pathways to escape to the exterior. Thus, while solar energy did its work on the outer surface, geophysical energy did the same from below, cracking the Ice Mantle; through these cracks, gases began to escape and contribute to the ongoing formation of the atmosphere.

146. The distance from the Sun halted sublimation and gave way to the thawing of the Ice Mantle. The external and internal thermal pressure on the ice resulted in the ice melting into water. Given the temperature of the globe, this process gave rise to an ocean that covered the equator and the tropical regions, and continued to push the two large blocks of ice—into which the original block had split—toward the geographic poles. The waters of this Mother Ocean were the waters that lay beneath the Firmament of the Heavens.

The Firmament of the Heavens that “was between the waters that were below and above its body” was the Atmosphere.

147. Identification of the Firmament, which clarifies many things for us.

First: Since the waters beneath the Firmament are the waters of the Mother Ocean, the waters above this Firmament are the waters of the solar gravitational field.

 This point reveals the need to approach the behavior of gravity from the perspective of the nature of fluids. This gives rise to the image of the Universe as an ocean of energy upon which continents and their islands float—in this case, astrophysical systems. There is more to be said about this ocean of energy, but for now it opens up new horizons for understanding the behavior of the gravitational field, mirroring the typical phenomenology of a fluid exposed to internal and external forces.

148. In summary:

The Light was the Mantle of Ice beneath which the rest of the geophysical structure was enclosed at the end of the First Day. Its creation came about through the fusion of the Primary Crust; and God initiated this fusion of the Primary Crust by accelerating the geonuclear pulse of the Globe. This increase in the working rhythm of the Earth’s astrophysical heart was the consequence of the multiplication of the density of the Earth’s gravitational field per astrophysical cubic unit.

149. At the beginning of the Second Day, the Earth and the Sun are reunited. God brings about a series of effects, the first of which is the sublimation of the Ice Mantle. The Mantle breaks apart, and the Atmosphere is born; its growth, driven by the gravitational pull at the origin of the stationary orbit, will impart an impressive physical acceleration. The two resulting blocks of ice begin their journey toward the geographic poles, leaving between them the waters of the Mother Ocean, from whose volume—through evaporation—the body of the Atmosphere will continue to be nourished. This Atmosphere is the Firmament in the Word of the Second Day.

150. Once the Firmament is identified, the movement of God’s spirit over the Waters is understood as its movement through Space. And we delve into the behavior of Gravity, which we can comprehend through our knowledge of the nature of liquids. This opens our minds to understanding the universal gravitational field as an ocean in which celestial systems appear as continents and islands, enabling celestial navigation thanks to their positions in local galactic space.

151. Fire, Ice, Water, and Air. These are the first rungs of the ladder of natural elements that we are climbing. The next one needs no introduction. In short, and to conclude:

A.—Fusion of the Primary Crust.

B. Sublimation of the Primordial Atmosphere.

 C. Thawing and Retreat of the Ice.

D. Formation of the Biospheric Atmosphere.

CHAPTER 17.—CREATION OF THE BIOSPHERIC INTERRELATIONSHIP PLANE

152. We conclude our ascent up the ladder of the natural elements and open a new path.

Ice, water, air—all the elements were in their proper places and ready for the great event of the leap from inorganic to organic matter. (This was the point at which Reason and Faith parted ways and followed paths as opposed as they were suicidal.)

Speaking of the evolution of species, the biblical sage par excellence dropped a stone into the water, saying: “And to exercise justice upon them, the elements came to an agreement, just as the sounds in a psaltery harmonize in unchanging harmony, as can be clearly seen from the events. For land animals are transformed into aquatic ones, and those that swim walk upon the earth.” These are the perceptive words of a man who did not hesitate to lament the loneliness of genius elsewhere, but who, during his finest moments, also did not hesitate to anticipate the scientific mind and assert that God gave him “the true science of things, and knowledge of the constitution of the universe and the power of the elements; the beginning, the end, and the middle of time; the alternations of the solstices and the changes of the seasons; the cycle of the years and the position of the stars; the nature of animals and the instincts of wild beasts; the force of the winds and the reasoning of men; the differences among plants and the virtues of roots. He knew all that is hidden and all that is manifest, for Wisdom, the architect of all things, taught it to me.”

 It is reasonable to believe that if Faith and Reason had listened with more humble ears to this confession of Solomon, the hostility between Christianity and science would not have reached the extremes it did in the early decades of the 20th century.

Returning to the topic of the evolution of the tree of life, the roots come first. That is where the tree begins to sprout. But for there to be a tree, there must be seed. Assuming that the Mother Cell—the Seed of Life—had its origin in God, it follows from the biohistorical sequences we are tracing that God planted the seed of the tree of species beneath the waters of the Great Ocean. And consequently, plants came first. From this underwater plant kingdom, as the first branches adapted to life on land—as the water level of the Great Ocean gradually receded—the tree of terrestrial plant species emerged. The evolution of this new kingdom was completed when photosynthesis transformed the chemical composition of the atmosphere.

153. This biohistorical step took place during the Evening of the Third Day. We have already seen how, once the Ice Sheet broke apart, the two resulting blocks began their retreat toward the poles, and how the ongoing evaporation of the Ocean, combined with the uplift of the mountain ranges due to gravitational pull, led to the multiplication of the Ocean into oceans and the division of the oceans into seas. Thus, as the water level gradually dropped, marine plants adapted to life on land, eventually transforming the prehistoric atmosphere into the historical atmosphere, with oxygen as its primary component. In turn, and as part of the necessary adaptation to the revolution that the plant kingdom itself was bringing about, the prehistoric plant fiber of the underwater substrate acquired the properties of historical terrestrial trees. With the creation of the kingdom of trees, God completed the structure of the Biospheric Interrelation Plane—a plane on which I will pause for a moment before taking off from the ground and launching this narrative into space.

154. The autonomy of the Biospheric Interrelation Plane can be summarized by stating that the polar ice caps were stabilized to serve as the two main thermoregulatory foci of the ecospheric system. God made the temperature balance of the biosphere dependent on these centers, and to stabilize the thawing of both thermoregulatory centers, God made them dependent on the Earth’s angle of rotation. Let’s take it one step at a time, however.

155. Let’s imagine for a second that the Earth were flat and always remained at the same distance from the Sun. What would happen? How long would it take for the Sun to heat the oceans to the boiling point and turn them into a pot of boiling water? And in how many geological hours would the atmosphere lose its thermodynamic equilibrium, and would its entire structure fall apart because the Earth’s angle of rotation lacks a regulatory mechanism? Let’s calculate how many years it would take for the temperature of the oceans and the atmosphere to skyrocket by ten degrees in the absence of the two polar thermoregulating centers. How would this temperature increase affect marine life? If human beings were to die as a result of a heat wave, how many would die each year if that heat wave persisted—and, worse still, threatened to rise another ten degrees over the next twenty years, for example?

156. What has been happening over these millions and millions of years is the opposite. The ecospheric cooling centers have remained constant; they have kept the biospheric temperature stable—always bearing in mind that as their mass decreased, the overall temperature was bound to rise. But by making the biospheric temperature dependent on the polar thermorefrigerating foci, our Creator was compelled to provide them with a geophysical platform. This platform— —I will call the Autonomous Ecospheric Substrate, and it relates to the equations underlying the immutability of the Earth’s angle of rotation.

CHAPTER 18.—THE AUTONOMOUS ECOSPHERIC SUBSTRATE

157. The Earth rotates around the Sun. We have seen that God made the thermodynamic stability of the biosphere dependent on the polar masses. Now it is time to study the mechanics that maintain the polar ice caps, for everything leads us to believe that temperature and the angle of rotation are directly related; yet the Earth orbits within a gravitational field subject to disturbances emanating from the central star, which transform interplanetary space due to its interrelation with the celestial realm to which it belongs. This causes an unstable rotational dynamic in the planets, a reflection of the Sun’s wobble.

(The Sun’s wobble means that its axis of rotation appears to move as if it were drunk, and just as a drunk person’s body sways from left to right, so too does the Sun’s axis tilt now to the right, now to the left. This movement is reflected with particular intensity in Mars’s rotation and should, by nature, be the natural state of the Earth’s axis. If the wobble of the planetary rotation axis is the rule, the Earth is the exception to the rule. The importance of this constant dynamic is vital if we remember that temperature and the angle of rotation are directly related.)

Our planet’s subjection to the law of solar tilt—the cause of which we would have to explore in another chapter—would cause the area of solar energy incidence on the continental geography to alternate, with the consequent effect of irregular thawing of the polar ice caps. But this does not happen, and hence the question: Why does the Earth always present the same angle of rotation to the Sun?

158. There is an explanation for this peculiarity. The answer lies in the law governing the tilt of the axis of rotation toward one hemisphere or the other of a body spinning on its own axis. Experience never fails us. Everyday reality offers us various examples of the nature and practical effects of this law. Its description is not complicated. Let’s think about it: what would happen if we started spinning around with our arms outstretched, holding an encyclopedia in one hand? Wouldn’t the arm holding the weight naturally drop in the direction of the weight it’s supporting? In short, there’s no one right way to look at examples—just as there’s no one right way to have tastes. Once the nature of the law and the effect it produces have been understood, everyone can come up with their own examples. Having understood the law in its entirety, what we must do now is apply it to the reality of the globe. I mean, all you have to do is grab a globe, place it on the table, and take a moment to observe this example of the encyclopedia in one hand alongside the phenomenon of the concentration of continents in one hemisphere. Isn’t the entire continental mass grouped in one hemisphere? The other hemisphere is occupied by the waters of the Pacific. We already have the encyclopedia on one arm of the Earth; what effect will we see if we now take the globe and begin to spin it on its axis?

159. This effect of the rotation angle tilting toward the overloaded hemisphere is precisely what God sought when He placed the pentacontinental mass on one hemisphere. The final effect produced was a fixed rotation angle. Why go to all that trouble? Well, the need to stabilize the Biospheric Interrelation Plane was a primary consideration. The creation of a stable thermodynamic platform was a necessity of evolution. Thanks to the pentacontinental concentration within one hemisphere of the planet, God ensured that the area of the globe exposed to solar energy would always remain the same. Thanks to this optical constancy, the growth curve of biospheric temperature—and thus the melting of the polar ice caps—would be maintained at a stable rate throughout all geological eras. (These are extremely simple and natural conclusions that must seem like heresy to proponents of plate tectonics, for example. But what can you do? There’s no accounting for taste, and you can’t please everyone.)

CHAPTER 19.—THEORY OF GEOPHYSICAL RINGS

160. I have stated that, by stabilizing the Earth’s angle of rotation through the displacement of continental mass across a hemisphere, God achieved a constant angle of incidence of sunlight on the geographic poles. From this effect, He hoped to bring about the gradual thaw that would grant the evolution of the tree of species the time necessary to be carried out to completion. And I have emphasized that, of course, this architectural model clashes with the famous hypothesis of continental drift. But it could not be otherwise. Continental drift cannot explain the constancy of the angle of rotation; and worse still, it contradicts its very existence. Not to mention, of course, that it fails to resolve any of the unknowns presented by the structure and morphology of the lithosphere. Denying these unknowns in order to impose fiction over science was, unfortunately, the attitude that the modern age adopted as a matter of philosophy in its atheism.

161. Moving beyond convoluted discussions, and starting from the materialization of the mathematics of the Autonomous Ecospheric Substrate, let us say that the geophysical architecture to which God gave His approval configures a structure in which the lithosphere functions as a compact ring rotating uniformly over a liquid, magmatic ring. The magmatic ring, or Mantle, in turn floats atop a chromospheric ring. And at the center, the microstar that constitutes the Core oscillates within the gravitational currents that serve as its orbit. Within this configuration, the fact that the temperature on the surface of the Core is equal to that of the Sun is no coincidence. Nor is it a coincidence that, by maintaining a constant lithospheric temperature, the oceans behave like the river water that a nuclear reactor needs to keep its temperature in equilibrium. (As for the equality of temperature between the surface of the Core and that of the Sun, it is not known whether this holds true for all members of the System or only for Earth. If it applies only to Earth, it is possible to derive a law of interaction between star and planet that confirms this rule of equality for every biospheric system. The size of the celestial body and its surface temperature would determine the distance to the planet in question. Although this is merely theoretical at present, wouldn’t the given equality imply a parity between the thermodynamic cycles of the Sun and the Core? In this case, what matters is not so much determining the relationship as understanding the interaction between the Sun and Earth).

162. Having said that, you will then tell me that what I am proposing is a kind of ball-bearing mechanism in which the magmatic ring functions like the balls on which the outer wheel moves. And I completely agree with you. You will then object that in this case we must explain how this pressure cooker does not explode. A subtle question that does you credit, and one to which you yourselves can answer based on your daily observation of the system that floats internal heat—namely, volcanoes. Are the waterlines of geonuclear heat not constant, and are they not marked by the circulation of electromagnetic currents?

CHAPTER 20.—THEORY OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL FLOATATION SYSTEM

163. Although it may seem like a pointless exercise, let us begin again. On the first Day, our Creator doubled the energy density per astrophysical cubic unit of the Earth’s gravitational field. The response of the Core—which was in a cold state at that time—was to activate and proceed to transform that supply into heat. Immediately, the Mantle liquefied and the Primary Crust melted. Once these processes were complete, the Core cooled again, causing the Crust to solidify and form the geophysical ring we call the Lithosphere. Had the Earth remained in the region where these processes took place, the cooling of its Core would have caused the Mantle to solidify as well. The Bible states that this did not happen because God separated the Earth from its region of origin and placed it within a gravitational field of stable density—the Solar System.

164. Once within the Sun’s sphere of influence, the geonuclear transformer reactivated and reached a constant temperature, equal to the external temperature of the star around which it orbits. I believe it is about six thousand degrees Celsius. This integration into the Solar System halted the solidification of the Mantle and, at the same time, maintained the solidity of the lithospheric ring, which would henceforth rotate with its own motion over the magmatic ring. Roughly speaking.

165. Given the constant heat production by the Core, the laws of physics require us to envision a sort of chromospheric zone between the Mantle and the Core, within which the Core itself oscillates; this oscillation—subject to the gravitational variations I mentioned earlier—causes the flattening of the poles that the Earth exhibits. (In this sense, the Core’s oscillation within the geophysical body depends on its own heat-production mechanics and its reaction to the thermonuclear waves at the origin of volcanoes. As for the Core’s morphology, the geophysical body’s own reaction to its oscillatory action provides certain clues. But this will be addressed at another time from different perspectives.)

166. It is this geophysical structure that leads us to ask the following question: How does the Earth release the internal heat stored within the lithospheric ring? The answer requires facts rather than theories, and well, although we are speaking of a lithosphere with a fixed angle of rotation over a magmatic surface, its body is equipped with a complex system of buoyancy tubes through which geonuclear heat is continuously released. To speak of volcanoes is to speak of the entire seismological dynamic that accompanies the creation of this geophysical architecture—impressive in its manifestation and perfect in its execution. Now: Why do the openings of the buoyancy system run along the boundaries of the great mountain ranges?

167. The correspondence between seismological lines and the lines of the major mountain ranges is explained by the physics of gravitational pull, the phenomenology of which any expert can clarify. And while we’re at it, the objection to the geophysical architecture that the continuous rise in temperature of a lithosphere subject to the law of the Autonomous Ecospheric Substrate would present is swept aside in one fell swoop by the constant temperature of the ocean floor, thanks to which the most exposed surface of the lithosphere curbs that natural rise—which, without that balance, would eventually cause this geophysical engineering structure to collapse. I believe that nuclear reactors make use of this very same theory to curb the heating of their reactors.

168. This autonomous geophysical system—the source of so many headaches—is complemented by a unique, extraordinary, and overwhelmingly marvelous planetary structure, the foundations of which I am honored to present to you. But I want to start with a fact. Better yet, from a law: namely, if every astrophysical system is a transformer of universal energy into light and heat, its operating speed will depend on the gravitational density of its field and on the number of revolutions per century of its celestial body. That’s one point.

169. On the other hand, it is fair to say that the sidereal velocity of a system—be it a constellation or a galaxy—is a constant derived from the forces of the astrophysical region to which that system belongs. In other words, if the Solar System were not interconnected with the Universe of the constellations, its cruising speed would depend exclusively on the amount of energy in its gravitational field. Since the Solar System is subject to the law of gravitational attraction between celestial bodies in the universe, the law itself tells us that as the distance between constellations decreases, the cruising speed of the stellar systems that compose them must logically increase. This is a universal effect from which we can infer that if the speed of the central star—on whose speed the smaller bodies of a system depend—accelerates, all bodies dependent on its physics will experience that variation. In some way, somehow.

170. And this is relevant because the question cannot be evaded or set aside due to certain contexts, especially once the Evolution of Life on Earth has been opened up to a complex system of physical equations without the resolution of which the future of life could not be guaranteed. The new relevant question is: How did God preemptively curb the possible disruptions that, in the future—precisely because our System is subject to this universal law—the Earth would experience? To better grasp the heart of the matter, let us compare our System to a spacecraft. Having compared the Solar System to a spacecraft in flight, what we are trying to discover here is whether this spacecraft was equipped with an emergency brake, or whether it simply drifts through the sea of constellations, exposed to gravitational winds and sidereal electromagnetic fields.

171. But why did God need to equip the Solar System with an emergency brake to maintain a stable cruising speed? This is the opposite question to the previous one. Well, I think the need is as obvious as the fact that all bodies in the universe are subject to the laws that govern it. If the wheels accelerate, won’t the chassis do so at the same time? If the Sun steps on the gas, won’t the planets suffer the consequences?

172. And to what extent will this hypothetical acceleration affect the central transformers of the planets—and especially that of Earth—once the direct relationship between speed and heat has been discovered? But what if the Sun’s speed were to drop abruptly now due to long-range electrodynamic interactions? In other words, did God rack his brains to create an Autonomous Ecospheric Substrate for the Biospheric Interrelation Plane, only to then expose the entire Geophysical Architecture to destruction as a result of a constellational shift in course? He drew lines, shifted continents from one hemisphere to the other, created seismically active zones, regulated geonuclear thermodynamics—he left nothing to chance, no loose end escaped his notice. And now, just as the adventure of life was beginning, was he going to leave the solar ship adrift in the interconstellational currents? The need to correct trajectories over time, control variations in space, and remotely govern matter compelled the Creative Intelligence to equip the Solar System with a safety brake that would maintain the central star’s cruising speed within a range of maximums and minimums. The question is what kind of automatic brake an astrophysical engineer must employ when placing a Solar System-type system into orbit. Although, of course, if we do not know what type the Solar System belongs to, we will hardly be able to find the answer. The answer is right before our eyes.

PART SIX

CREATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM

CHAPTER 21.—APPLIED FINITIST SYSTEMOLOGY (DYNAMIC STRUCTURE OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM

173. The answer to the enigma presented in the previous section—namely, what kind of automatic brake maintains the Solar System’s cruising speed constant in defiance of the law of gravity, which dictates the need for constant acceleration due to the decreasing distances between the Sun and any point it approaches?—the answer to this dilemma is unequivocal. Now, and I admit my shortcoming, duty requires that we specify the nature of the problem more precisely. I mean, we are—or have been—accustomed to working with a “photo finish” of the Solar System. Here it is:

174. Out of inertia and due to a virtual simulation ingrained during our years of intellectual training, we tend to be omniscient, and the application of Kepler’s laws to this imaginary snapshot is enough to make us feel like gods. This conditioning dates back centuries, and the image is ingrained in our very being with such subtlety that professionals in intellectual education need only impose order with the baton of their state regimes to resolve the issue. The fact is that today this simplistic image of Keplerian motion is characteristic of stunted minds and intellects devoid of any independent thought and lacking any capacity for critical judgment. The truth is that the result looks good—even beautiful—and achieves its goal: to make even the biggest idiot feel greater than Saint Thomas and Saint Augustine combined. When it comes to correspondence with Reality, this image of a Solar System frozen in time is the very opposite of the physics of a Solar System that moves among stars just a few light-years away and with which it clearly forms—cacophony?—an open star cluster.

175. If we take as a benchmark the parameters of the open star clusters in our skies, and combine them with those of binary and multiple star systems—where the distances between the stars in an individual star system often exceed the distance between the Sun and Alpha Centauri, for example— I wonder: where is that picture for children just beginning to learn astrophysics, the one that came out of Kepler’s workshop in the days of María Castaña? They say that the law operates at infinite distances—and yet is it denied that that same law acts between bodies situated a mere four or five light-years apart? Someone, in addition to common sense, lost their reason throughout the nineteenth century, and no one in the 20th century—with the Academy having embarked on the adventure of the Search for the Origin of the Cosmos, already settled into the Time Ship that was to carry the scholars to the Core of the Origin and from there leap to the End via a fold in Space... it never occurred to anyone to press the button and set in motion the image of a Solar System frozen in time that Kepler launched into the future. Not even just for a bit of fun. The dogmatism of the disciples of the Einsteinian revolution proved to be so primitive and entrenched that even with the most up-to-date dynamic calculations on the table, not a single astronomer dared to press the button and see the Solar System exactly as it exists in Space and Time—embedded in a Local Star Cluster and with its planetary members endowed with solid structure. It is, therefore, depressing to the point of outright laughter to open an astronomy textbook written by university professors—such as the Complutense University of Madrid textbook, for example, so as not to get lost in other, more subtle languages—and read that Pluto is a gaseous body. Because one is well-mannered, one holds back the urge to vomit. Let us continue, then.

176. I stated above that the answer to why the Solar System’s velocity escapes the realm of the law of gravity—by whose force the entire universe is governed—must be unequivocal, simple, and logical. I now recognize that verbal expressions, unlike mathematics, possess an ambiguity so profound that it is capable of swallowing up in its abyss the purity of any mountain of numbers. And I would like to explain this enigma. The word, in short, is a vehicle capable of carrying different passengers within it, and it so happens that, depending on the passenger, a word can cease to mean one thing and come to have a new meaning. Politicians are masters of this art. But not only them—let’s not be cruel to those little creatures. A number, for example, is a perfect entity; its meaning is non-transferable, divine in its incorruptibility—hence the pagan, wild adoration that mathematicians feel for these entities. A four is a four, and whether applied to bananas or mice, the essence and substance of the four—as an abstract, pure, immaculate entity—remains unchanged despite any alterations. I, who am a jerk—and in being so, serve as an example, for I can just as easily be a cretin as a flower, which illustrates the ambiguity of the word, a confusion to which the number lends itself under no circumstances—and because I defend the need to press the button of the Solar Systemological Movement in order to overcome Keplerian traumas and the complexes inherited from past centuries, I keep to myself the laughter I feel when I see online the staunch defense of this ancient systematological system which, though it was once born to revolutionize, is now the most reactionary system I know. I do not know why astronomers do not fulfill their duty and process the mountain of data with which, had Kepler and Newton worked, the established image of the inherited system would already have joined the long list of errors—necessary as a step forward, but enemies of Civilization due to their refusal to move on to a better history.

177. But just because an answer can be unequivocal does not mean it cannot be complex. It all depends on the model being used. If the reasoning clashes with a way of thinking rooted in the archetypal image that identifies planets as balls of gas, one will ultimately arrive at the Bridge of Sighs, only to write a melancholy “Poor thing!” upon the waters. Once this problem is overcome—and assuming that the database at our disposal makes it impossible for us to maintain an active answer derived from a series of data points that carry no weight at the foot of the mountain of knowledge from whose summit we once again gaze upon the Universe, the Cosmos, and the Solar System—the decision is ours, and the processing of this cluster of parameters has been left in our hands; their final equivalence, and because it is based on a new set of data, must logically present us with a Local Stellological Architecture with respect to which—without denying the Keplerian photo finish—this Applied Finistic Systemology aims to be nothing more than the opening act and never the final word on the central question of this Section: Why is the Sun’s speed stable and deviates from the law of universal gravitation, according to which, as the Sun approaches an astrophysical system, its speed should double depending on the distance?

178. It is clear that, due to its very complexity, an answer is nonetheless simple. We must place it in its true context. We must specify the nature of the problem it embodies. We must define which law it invokes. We must make room and sketch on the screen of our intellect the nature of the question to which we seek an answer. There comes a point when the experts must step in, for they are the ones who possess the database whose analysis can demonstrate or refute—if applicable—the Sun’s integration into a star cluster, more or less open and more or less populous depending on the gravitational architecture that these data reveal. Let us consider a new local stellar expansion to 20 light-years:

179. How many open star clusters could serve as astrophysical models for us? Obviously, we are talking about a true revolution in our conceptualization of what a star cluster is. We will have to discard old concepts and work our way from binary systems to opening up regional gravitational fields in universal space, within whose perimeters the stars behave like atoms within an astrophysical molecule. This would explain the optical constancy of stellar formations in the heavens, the constancy of distances and velocities of stellar systems within the Universal Milky Way Network, and would present us with a Universe that behaves like a Crystalline Body, powered by gravitational currents, depending on which the consumption of total energy remains over time within a range of maximums and minimums. Hence the fluctuations in stellar luminosities. This implies God, of course, but in this cosmological system God is taken for granted, so let us now address the local answer to the problem of the constancy of the Sun’s velocity.

180. At this point I must correct myself; after having highlighted the truly important point—the existence of the Sun as a member of a sidereal system— my own line of thought leads me to define the transformation of planetary mass into a Solar Orbit Correction Mechanism, through whose action the centrifugal force to which the Sun is subjected in response to the motion of its system within a cumulative gravitational field is nullified and reduced to a specific constant. If I previously stated that “We need only transform the total mass of the planetary family into drag mass, and we already have the stabilizing brake for the Sun’s cruising speed,” I now believe that this transformation focuses its effect on the Solar Orbit Correction Equation, by which, as I have said, the centrifugal force to which the Sun is subject is overcome through the transformation of planetary mass into Remote-Controlled Directional Guidance. (If an objection comes to mind, imagine running by propelling only your own body, and then repeat the same action while carrying a sack of sand on your back. That’s just for starters. But before we hoist onto our backs—not the Globe, like that titan, but the nine planets with their moons and the belts of solar rings—before we grasp the lever to move the universe, you will have to cast off the ballast of the outdated view of the planets as immense balls of gas floating among the electromagnetic threads of the Sun’s field).

181. I want to emphasize this point because I believe it is important. The academic claim that planets are balls of gas compressed under gravitational pressure is one of those primitive pseudoscientific arguments, typical of 20th-century fundamentalism, that do not stand on their own in any way, yet persist in the 21st century as a symbol of universities’ submission to the genius of scientific atheism. How long will idiocy and genius go hand in hand on both sides of the same coin? It is not easy to say. Just yesterday, for example, Mars was a ball of gas, like Venus, Mercury, Jupiter, Saturn, and the other members of our solar system. And this is still how it is described in the textbooks produced by the planet’s most prestigious minds for the general public. The photos and expeditions to Mars and its neighbors serve as evidence regarding this issue—that of the absurd gaseous view of the planets. Nevertheless, the evidence is not sufficient to erase this shameful hoax from astronomy textbooks and natural science books. It is therefore laughable—bordering on the ridiculous—to see the eminent geniuses at astronomical observatories around the world continuing to preach the gospel of the gaseous nature of the planets. They must have some hidden reason for confessing with their lips what their ears recognize as heresy. Now then, if there is any eminent super-scholar at any university in the world who can prove that Mars is a ball of gas, let him not stand idly by but exorcise us—for, by fulfilling the will of such a mega-god, we will go to the Tartarus of fools. It’s cringe-worthy—I say—to see words in astronomy textbooks that could only be excused if spoken by an idiot; it’s cringe-worthy because those who write them are all eminent figures, holders of professorships and the like. Does the 21st century deserve the typical mind of a fool as its teacher and guide to knowledge of the universe? The question remains: under what kind of philosophy will we grant a “cosmology of suicide” a voice, knowing that its effects on nations—this time with infinitely more deadly means of destruction at their disposal—will be the same? Let us remember that Satan did not kill with a sword, but with the word, because—though there are still those who do not believe it—the ultimate weapon, for good and for evil, is the word. How, then, can we believe these days that Pluto is a ball of gas? At this point, one must be a true boor to teach such nonsense, and an idiot to believe it. For those who write and read outside that deadly circle typical of the 20th century, what interests us now is discovering how the sum of the total planetary mass comes into play when it comes to the corrective stabilization of the Sun’s cruising speed. Let us return, then, to the problem at hand, for on another occasion the circumstances themselves will lead us back into the belly of this black hole, where the minds of the world’s youth are being brainwashed, and where it is unnaturally taught that planets are balls of gas. And I am Little Red Riding Hood, that much is clear.

182. Let us then pick up the thread. Traveling at cruising speed X, we find among the constellations of the heavens a star called the Sun. The friction of this spacecraft against the flight surface is negligible in terms of slowing its speed; and, more naturally, the centrifugal force to which its orbit is subject propels this spacecraft outward from the gravitational field to which it belongs. Our problem is to understand why its speed of approach relative to the star toward which it is moving does not increase as time passes. Regardless of whether the Sun travels in a straight line or along a curved path, as the Sun navigates through interstellar space, the distances between it and the apparent point of approach grow shorter. That’s obvious. And as the distance between the Sun and the apparent point of approach shortens, the force of attraction between the Sun and that stellar point increases. The law of gravity prevails. As the gravitational pull between the Sun and the reference star system increases, the approach velocity increases. Consequently, our Solar System’s cruising speed increases. And it keeps increasing. The shorter the distance between two celestial bodies, the higher the speed of the smaller of the two becomes. We may or may not be talking about the Sun. Whether the Sun is the larger or smaller celestial body in the pair in question, the fact is that a change in its cruising speed occurs. But since we’re talking about the Sun… let’s talk.

183. I believe the distance from the Sun to the nearest star system is a few light-years. Proxima Centauri is about four light-years from the Sun. Even closer stars have been discovered. At the Sun’s current speed—about 600 kilometers per second—the collision between the Sun and the Proxima Centauri system, counting from right now, would take place in approximately 500 years. We now ask ourselves point-blank: How many thousands of years has the Sun been traveling among the constellations of the heavens? And from these millions of years during which life on Earth has continued its course without experiencing a lethal disruption, can we not infer the stability of the Sun’s cruising speed? And are we not entitled to believe that the Sun’s speed is a constant? And if it is a constant, doesn’t this constant compel us to revise our understanding of gravity—not as a law, but in terms of its very nature? I’d like to emphasize that my questions are meant to open up new avenues of thought, never to close them off. To the best of my knowledge, I’m doing my best to condense my thoughts so as to view the process from a dynamic perspective. I cannot accept the Keplerian “photo finish” in my mind, and if I were to compare the motion of the planets around the Sun to anything, it would be to an electric current flowing through a metal rod, such as a solenoid. The very angularity of the orbits projected into three-dimensional space reveals the need for a flight through current waves, where the Sun occupies the place of the metal rod. Something like this:

184. Working from this image, the three-dimensional issue is simplified, and the nutational irregularities of some outer orbits can be deduced. In another section, devoted exclusively to the Solar System, I will return to the topic, attempting to further define the image by incorporating physical data. My intention with this solenoidal image is simply to displace the image frozen in time that has been circulating since the days of Kepler, Galileo, and Newton—an image that has become a wall in our times, a cheap idol before which everyone believes themselves to be a genius, and, bending their knees, goes home content because they already know it all.

185. The Academy, always so brilliant, knows how to find at every moment the explanation that best suits it to keep its glory intact in the face of future criticism. And the fact is that, apparently, the Sun travels along an atypical trajectory, such that it avoids gravitational contact with the other constellations. Playing the fool in the style of that Socrates who knew only that he knew nothing—yet knowing everything—the Academy forbids universities from removing from astronomy textbooks the falsehoods upon which their understanding of the Solar System and its place in the Universe is based. Because, of course, if the Sun does not follow a natural trajectory as a body subject to the law of universal gravity, what kind of trajectory does the Sun trace among the other star systems in its neighborhood? The simple calculation I outlined above regarding Proxima Centauri can be extrapolated to the last five hundred million years; given that the Sun has been on the brink of collision five hundred thousand times, the fact that it hasn’t collide gives me reason to dismiss the naive notion of a solitary Sun, a member of no cluster. And it should bring you to a screeching halt; as you look up, you should feel the vibrations of the stellar engine beneath your feet. Ask yourselves how it is possible that the Sun, in the millions of years it has been traveling at 600 km per second, has not collided with any of these neighbors. Doesn’t it seem logical to think that it couldn’t and can’t—simply because the Sun belongs to this cluster? I’ll reiterate the image:

186. This is truly an interesting question, one that—due to the simplicity of its statement—may sound like an insignificant trifle. A serious mistake. Or does the passenger boarding an airplane have no interest whatsoever in the mechanics of the aircraft, knowing as we do that one risks one’s life in the air? Isn’t the entire Sun an eternal spacecraft in flight, filled with passengers? As for maintaining the Sun’s autonomous velocity, we can deduce it by relating the Sun’s photospheric phenomena to the combustion of the fuel needed to propel a body through space. In what way are large solar flares different from the jet of a rocket engine that propels a spacecraft in the opposite direction of its emission? Are not both phenomena subject to the same law of action and reaction? Let us suppose for a moment that this is the case. And since we know the eleven-year cycle that governs the temperature of the Sun’s photosphere—and since this cycle of photospheric heating is subject to a stable cycle—can we not deduce from its constancy the mechanics of controlled propulsion that govern the Sun’s cruising speed, mechanics that are in turn subject to the law of the transformation of gravitational energy into light energy? The answer is difficult but not impossible.

187. Let’s consider the Sun’s reaction to the passage of Comet Hale-Bopp. Do you remember it? Isn’t the extraordinary solar flare observed on the Sun’s surface immediately after Comet Hale-Bopp’s passage a phenomenon sufficient to open our minds to the connection between temperature, gravitational density, and the rate of transformation—in this case triggered by a wavefront with a solid head? And if the connection between the passage of Hale-Bopp and the extraordinary flare observed is a scientific fact, how can we continue to maintain the relationship between the Sun and the planets within the same behavioral parameters when a tiny body is enough to accelerate the transformation rate of an entire star for a certain period of time!

188. One of the basic pillars of the development of human thought concerns the search for the root causes of observed effects—and, conversely, the discovery of effects based on given causes. Thanks to the mind’s ability to make use of the tools of logic, the adventure of thought was able to reach unexpected heights. But as time went on and many feats were accomplished, the thinkers—who were once revolutionary—committed the nefarious crime defined as eliminating the root cause of the observed effect because the discovery did not suit their subjective interests and irrational emotions. With the 20th century lost in the web of a scientific atheism that erased causes and pitted reasons against the logic of reality, it is to be expected that the heirs of those geniuses know how to twist the path between effect and cause and lead the ignorant into the abyss of an outdated irrationality. For, though it may be very difficult to believe, science became atheistic to prove to itself that it knew more than God. The fact that its discourse came to an end in the wake of the Great War did not cause it to reconsider, during the Cold War, the pathology into which its intelligence had led its logic. That pathology was called atheism. But let us return to the subject of our Solar System.

189. The first to consider all the factors to be taken into account regarding the dynamic stability of the Solar System was the Engineer who conceived its creation within an astrophysical molecular network called the Heavens. The greatest difficulty God faced was posed by the millions of years that the evolution of the tree of species required for its birth and growth. While in the case of the creation of the biosphere, processes could be accelerated without causing any scientific conflict, in the case of life, the law was—and remains—very different. In the realm of life, let’s put it this way: the laws are more rigorous. The millions of years that the evolution of life on Earth necessarily demanded of God had to present Him with a complex system of systematic equations. Among these, how to maintain the Sun’s cruising speed constant in space and time, and how to provide its System with a flight path such that it would glide among the constellations without becoming integrated into their systems, were the two great and principal challenges that its Intelligence had to overcome. And in seeking to understand how it did so, this is where we stand.

190. The flight autonomy that the nature of stars—as transformers of energy into light and heat—provides them, a phenomenon very similar to the behavior of an excited particle that defends itself by radiating a subparticle, is an aspect that implies the need to correct the hypothesis of astrophysical motion based solely on the law of universal gravity. It is not denied; rather, its definition is simply corrected. If until now the law of gravity was the sole force, from now on we have a mechanics of energy transformation, one of whose effects generates the propulsion autonomy necessary to maintain the System’s constant velocity. In this context, the phenomenology of the solar photosphere serves as our frame of reference from which to conceptualize a star as a spacecraft propelled autonomously through the transformation of its energy into the fuel necessary to maintain its initial momentum. It is another matter entirely if, in its scientific irrationality, the Academy wishes to deny the application of the action-reaction law to stellar flares and sidereal velocity. The author does not see how such a denial could be demonstrated and, consequently, prefers to proceed with his exposition on the relationship between the planets and the Sun’s rotation during its path among the constellations that mark its orbit.

191. Let’s consider this scenario. We have the System in which we are going to cultivate the Tree of Life. We know for certain that millions of natural years must pass from the time we plant it until it bears fruit. We also know that the “ ” development of Life requires that Nature maintain its Structure under conditions specific to it. This means we must prevent external cosmological factors from interfering with the evolutionary process. This compels us to protect the Biospheric System in such a way that, while remaining within a Universe, the very existence of that Universe does not create a lethal interference for it. How can this be done? The Sun’s own cruising speed—about 600 kilometers per second—and its subjection to the law of gravity dictate that, as time passes, this speed must increase, which is precisely what we do not want. Consequently, this compels us to equip the Solar System with a safety brake that activates automatically in response to an increase in its speed. That is the goal. Let’s see what practical solutions our Creator found.

192. The first practical solution was logical: to load the solar spacecraft in such a way that gravitational acceleration would be counteracted by the work of displacement, forcing the spacecraft to transform that external acceleration into the force necessary to perform the work of displacing the braking load. In this practical way, the solar spacecraft would maintain a constant cruising speed while overcoming the inertial tendency to increase its speed over time. But let’s apply this concept to the ground. Let’s imagine we have a car loaded with fuel. The amount of time the car will spend on the road will depend not only on its speed but also on the weight we load into it. If we fill the trunk to capacity, we reduce the operating time the fuel tank can provide. We’ll call this type of brake “exogenous.”

193. But now let’s imagine an even more sophisticated type of exogenous brake. Let’s imagine that as the vehicle travels a greater distance, the load in the trunk multiplies its weight. Wouldn’t there come a point when the vehicle would be slowed to a stop, crushed under the weight acquired by this exogenous brake? The question is: Is the Sun equipped with this type of exogenous brake, such that the weight of the planets is multiplied by the potential energy acquired over time? And conversely, isn’t it by this law of the increase in potential energy and its transformation into weight that the Sun’s tendency to behave according to the law of universal gravitation is slowed down?

194. If the ideas about the nature of the planets are false, then so must the numbers be. This leads me to say that we cannot get anywhere as long as the dictatorship of 20th-century cosmology continues to impose its dogmatic law and its rationalist absolutism on the intellect of the 21st century. Until just yesterday, Mars—as I said before—was a ball of gas. So if we have to wait for probes to reach Pluto to translate its body into geophysical mass, let’s sit back and wait for death to come; death will arrive before the probe reaches Pluto. Once the correct calculations are on the table, then we can begin to work with facts rather than with arguments imposed on the basis of awards. Moving beyond destructive criticism of such geniuses, let’s continue our journey aboard the solar spacecraft and keep asking ourselves questions.

195. The Sun is approaching a star system, and as a result, its acceleration is going to skyrocket, even in the face of the exogenous brake’s effectiveness. How are we going to overcome this new problem? In the imaginative game we’ve launched at , we’re in command; we’re piloting the spacecraft, and therefore its future depends on us. What we should do now is take the wheel and turn, for example, to the left. Either that, or we’ll crash into the celestial bodies of the star system toward which the law of gravity is pulling us. Maybe not tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. It amounts to the same thing. Our mission is to find a way to initiate the turn that will lead us away from the inevitable collision with the system whose gravity has taken control of our ship’s controls. The first thing that comes to mind is to look for the steering wheel. Where is it? Because it certainly exists. Millions of years and the Sun still on course are the best proof that God has endowed the solar spacecraft with an exogenous brake—namely, the planets and the interplay of the energies that move them—and with a steering wheel that is operated by a remote-control program capable of overcoming the invincible interstellar acceleration, forcing the spacecraft to turn. My intellect leads me to look around and ask myself: What kind of endogenous force is capable of making the Solar System behave like a spacecraft piloted by an intelligent captain? To make possible this rotation that the Sun has been performing since the dawn of time—and without which the spacecraft would have become part of just any star system in the neighborhood—what kind of autonomous mechanics did God endow the Sun with?

196. As I did yesterday and as I always do, I raise my arms to my Creator and dedicate to Him the joy that stirs in my mind—the joy born of my admiration for the answer He provided to these problems. The remote route-control program is called Interplanetary Alignment. Now that the exogenous brake has been created, what good is a brake if there is no foot to press it? We will call this action of the foot on the brake “Endogenous Rotational Mechanics.” If the exogenous braking action comes as a response of the System as a whole to the universal environment, this action of the foot on the brake is a response of the planets to the Sun’s behavior. More or less. But before delving into the effect of planetary alignments on the Sun’s trajectory, I’d like to remind you of the multiplication of arm strength underwater and the reduction in a body’s weight when submerged in water. Don’t think I’m doing this to throw you off track. On the contrary, I’m doing it to shed light on the natural environment in which the interplay of natural forces within our System operates.

197. Consider that the weight of a body is directly related to gravity. A one-kilogram rock has the same mass on Earth as it does on the Moon. And doesn’t that same rock have the same mass in water as it does out of water? Do they have the same weight, however? Of course not, right? Now let’s apply this reality to the Sun itself. This is not to claim to match the vision of the genius who sought a lever to move the universe. Let’s imagine, then, that we place the Sun at one end of the lever, we position ourselves at the other end, and it’s up to us to move it. The first thing we must ask ourselves is what the value of gravity is in the environment in which we find ourselves. Although it may seem like a trick, the lower the gravity, the less the body weighs and the greater the effectiveness of the force exerted by our arm against the lever. The conclusion is obvious. The weight of the Sun and of any celestial body varies according to the gravitational interaction at any given moment. That’s one point. The other is that, unlike the Sun, the planets in our Solar System do move within a stable gravitational environment and therefore maintain a balance between the force they exert and the weight they can lift.

198. The Planetary Alignment—whether total or partial, multiple or simple—acts like a lever, and its effect on the Sun is that of the lever against the fulcrum. The systemological equation states that the Sun’s acceleration is slowed by the regulatory program into which God transformed the planetary alignment. The planets transform the weight of the single body into which the alignment converts them into force; and since every force, by its very nature, performs work, the work they perform is to bring about the angle of rotation we were discussing and to keep it constant. This, in effect, is the flywheel we were looking for.

199. As for the physical-mathematical description of this remotely controlled starship in autonomous flight within the constellations of the Heavens, I leave that to someone more expert in numbers, unknowns, and other complex equations. Always highlighting both partial and total planetary alignments within the framework of Applied Astrophysical Systemology—the former acting as a counterbalance to velocity, and the latter as the displacement of the System’s bow toward the hemisphere from which the loading takes place. In short, before sowing the seed of the tree of species beneath the waters of the great ocean, there were many equations that God had to solve.

200. In conclusion: Everything remains to be resolved at the level of final data. Ideas are the prelude to research. And in this context, I have sought to refine my initial idea regarding the relationship between the planets and the Sun within a shared gravitational field, in which—just as the solar field itself is the cause of a centrifugal force that repels bodies and produces the outer asteroid belts— being integrated into the Sun within a multi-stellar field, whose center is gravitational—as if to say it is a reference point around which cumulative motion occurs—this center is the source of a general centrifugal force, which the Sun overcomes through the total planetary mass corresponding to its system. This leads us, ultimately, to a structure of astrophysical engineering so perfect that to leave it to chaos is, plain and simple, the act of a genius incapable of understanding the complex edifice of equations that This Divine Engineer solved at the beginning, and because they are incapable of accepting failure—since they cannot emulate, if not in three dimensions then at least on paper, the infinite Science of this Creative Intelligence—they opt for the madman’s alternative: God does not exist. Let the astronomers and mathematicians of this century take note, then.

201. Things, then, are what they are, and not what they seem; although sometimes what they seem to be is what they are. We are speaking of an indefinite number of millions of years, a time during which the biospheric system demanded its integration into a stable astrophysical structure. So far, the time scales for the geophysical sequences described have not been included in the account. I left these numbers to the challenges that God overcame one by one. And I believe I have said that once Creative Omnipotence is related to the physical concept of power, natural calculations are burned in Fire, frozen in Ice, drowned in Water, and evaporated in Air. Over how many millions of years did God reduce the sublimation and thawing of the Ice Mantle by integrating the Earth into the Solar System via the boreal parabola? If the thawing of the Ice Mantle had been exposed to the distance corresponding to the third orbit, how many millions of years would the thawing have lasted?  

PART SEVEN

CREATION OF THE HEAVENS

CHAPTER 22.—THE GENERAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE

202. The purpose and goal of the creation of the Heavens and the Earth—Mankind at the end of the tunnel of time—is that we are seeing how God designed the general architecture of the Heavens and the specific architecture of the Earth, taking into account the millions of years that the Birth and Growth of the Tree of Life required to bear fruit. Because He could and knew how to do so, God created a blueprint for the relationships among the elements of the biosphere, with two main heating and cooling centers at the extremes of the ecosphere, and specific focal points distributed across the continents—namely, the mountain ranges of perpetual snow. The way in which atmospheric and oceanic currents are recycled from the polar centers and keep the biospheric temperature stable is a feat of geophysical engineering as marvelous as it is surprising, one that involved the morphology of the lithosphere itself. Because He had to keep the ecospheric temperature stable, He had to endow the Ecosphere with a perpetual angle of rotation. And because it could and knew how, it created the Autonomous Ecospheric Substrate, thanks to which, as I have already said, the angle of incidence of solar energy would remain constant over the millions of years the Tree of Life would need to bear fruit. But there was even more, because the Solar System is not isolated from the rest of Creation, and since it is in motion and subject to the general laws of the Universe, this interrelation could and did cause interference that might ruin the work of so many millions of years. Because it was possible—and God knew this—He did not hesitate to deploy His intelligence and endow the Solar System with a mechanism for remotely controlling its sidereal velocity, which I have called Applied Astrophysical Systemology. And yet all this was not enough.

203. The local Universe, the Milky Way, moves within a Cosmos in which motion is the most characteristic visible feature. There may be qualitative and quantitative differences among galaxies, but they all share a common denominator: they move. To say they move is to say that they interact, multiply, divide, add, and subtract. Creation is constant, overwhelming, marvelous, and surprising movement. Moreover, the Cosmos depicted in 20th-century theories and Hubble’s Cosmos resemble one another about as much as a seal resembles a swallow. In the real one—Hubble’s—there is no homogeneous movement, no standard distances, no patterns. The realm of galaxies is pure diversity, pure harmony in the discovery of the unknown, ecstasy in the apotheosis of cosmic matter’s infinite capacity to reproduce in space and entertain without ever becoming tedious. Genius unfurled to the four winds, beauty that manifests itself joyfully and makes no claim to being the latest trend. Stars form in clusters upon clusters of trillions of celestial bodies that neither destroy nor collapse; they are like lighthouses in the vastness of the cosmos. Galaxies— —that, like underwater creatures, travel through cosmic currents and, like eagles, spread their wings and let themselves be carried by intergalactic winds. Where is the Cosmos of the 20th Century?

204. In fact, the celestial structure we observe in our immediate surroundings exhibits very distinctive characteristics. Ultimately, the whole resolves into a constellational architecture defending the astrophysical heart, from whose center its unique optical configuration emerges. For, just as we can observe with our telescopic eyes, the universe is traversed by powerful gravitational currents displacing vast masses of clouds from one side to the other—the origin of the nebulae. Thus, when God reveals to us that “He created the stars of the Firmament to separate Light from Darkness,” He tells us much about how the Solar System would be affected by the Earth’s passage through one of those nebular currents. And it reveals to us the nature of the constellational shields.

205. The Biblical text is crystal clear. “God created the stars to separate the light from the darkness,” it says. On the First Day, we are told that God created the Light and separated it from the Darkness. On this Fourth Day of the First Week of Human History, it is stated that, having separated the Light from the Darkness, God created the Heavens to separate the Light from the Darkness. The Text could not be more direct. The fact that the conclusions drawn from this are fascinating and—because they are so marvelous—completely at odds with the mindset of the twentieth century means nothing. Modern man’s opinion on the nature of the universe does not matter. God did not write His Revelation to Moses with modern man in mind. Whoever did not matter to God cannot matter to His children either. The conclusions they reached are of no interest to this book, nor are their opinions of interest to the author. So let us move forward.

206. The structure of the Universe of Revelation and its resolution in the mirror of Reality give us, by implication, the following: namely, the Universe of Genesis is the Milky Way. And it is regarding the Creation of this Milky Way that it is said: “God created the Heavens to separate the Earth from the realm of the Galaxies.” This is a physical necessity inferred from the study of the Heavens, and from whose phenomena it is evident that on the other side of the Heavens, powerful currents and winds sweep through the Cosmos. There are the astronomical images, speaking with the power of a thousand words per photograph. Their beauty, however, must not cloud the clarity of our understanding when interpreting the events that cause them. The physical function fulfilled by the star clusters surrounding us is that of a net that traps everything carried by the current and blocks the path of intergalactic clouds into the constellation system around which they are distributed. Let us now ground the divine declaration—that the Heavens were created to erect a protective wall between Earth and the world of the galaxies—on scientific foundations.

207. The description, then, of the General Cosmological Space that we have inherited paints a picture of a Universe-Galaxy that moves and interacts with other bodies through general laws. This fits perfectly with the expansion of Matter to infinity suggested by the Idea of Creation. The need to understand why God created the Heavens to protect the Earth from the General Cosmic Movement implies the answer to the relationship between God and that multiplication of Matter to infinity. And the answer to this question leads us directly to that other question which the genius of the 20th century sought to answer with his cosmological theory, namely: Before the beginning, what? A question that, in turn, leads us directly to ask what part God played in that Beginning of beginnings and what He was before this General Cosmological Beginning. This matter compels us to enter the realm of theology while always maintaining the scientific attitude that has thus far served as the language of understanding between Creation and us.

208. Before Creation was Non-Creation, and before the Creator was God. God declares Himself Eternal, and there is nothing to be said about His Age. But He also confesses: “Before Me no God was formed; none will be after Me.” Thus, knowing that God is Eternal and that therefore the “Formation” of which He speaks could not pertain to His Nature, it follows that this “Formation” referred to His Intelligence—which is the part of Being that grows and develops over time. This is a logical conclusion that places the Knowledge of the Science of Creation in one category and, in the other, the Being who possessed all the Natural Attributes of God. When these two things united and became one, God became the Creator and Reality became His Creation.

209. I have touched on when and how this cosmological revolution took place in the History of Jesus. There I delved into the topic of the History of Uncreation and elaborated on its key moments. I seem to recall saying that the Creator came into being because He was in God. More or less, what I meant was that just as Intelligence without Power is not sufficient to transform Reality, neither does Power without Intelligence possess that faculty. And I affirmed there that Power was in God and Intelligence in the Uncreated Force, the Origin of all things. I recall placing Eternity and Infinity alongside God, but not in opposition to Him. And I described that uncreated relationship by speaking of the Childhood of the Divine Being. And this Childhood from the perspective of the revolution that led God to become the Origin of all new things. Regarding this process, He spoke of Himself, saying that He was formed. A process of formation that can only be understood as carried out by Infinity and Eternity as uncreated realities that had in God the center of all that moved and came into being. And once the Creator was formed in God, the revolution was consummated that would make God, Infinity, and Eternity one and the same. Roughly speaking.

210. From this ontological revolution that integrated God, Space, Time, and Matter arises the concept of the General Cosmological Principle—that is, the event that marked a “Before” and an “After.” With this in mind, the genius of the twentieth century spoke of a Big Bang, and in *Divine History* I posited a natural creative activity in which God transformed Reality, starting from the very structure of Reality itself. That is to say, there was the destruction of a previous cosmos and the transformation of that cosmos into a new one, which, like everything that begins, originated from an event or General Cosmological Principle. A General Cosmological Principle that irreversibly marked the “Before” and the “After.” The question is how God brought this Principle into being—of which the beginning of our Universe, in particular, is a fragment of the historical sequence set in motion by that Event.

211. The answer to this question requires discussing the fundamental laws of the Movement of Multiplication of Cosmic Matter that have been at work since Eternity. However, unlike the Uncreated Cosmos—which involved the Infinite in that Multiplication—since this Movement had its Origin in God, it was revolutionized and carried out by fields that transform matter into cosmic energy and this cosmic energy into astrophysical matter. To understand this phenomenology, let us draw upon the quantum nature of atomic matter.

212. Both in laboratory observations and in particle accelerators, the reproduction of matter originates in the increase in dynamic energy that transforms the relationship between the particle and the field in which it moves. From the very inception of quantum physics, it was observed that an increase in mass requires an increase in kinetic energy—a relationship that Einstein sought to capture in his famous energy equation. But if, in the atom within its natural environment, the particle responds to an increase in its velocity by converting the difference into mass—and does the same in an accelerator—if we remove the velocity limit from the equation and proceed to extract the particle from its environment, endowing it with the characteristics of cosmic energy in free flight within a space devoid of electromagnetic reference: that particle will continue to convert the difference in velocity into mass. Assuming we apply an accumulation of trajectories extending to infinity, we already have the leap from quantum matter to astrophysics. This was the uncreated natural process.

213. God revolutionized this process by concentrating the trajectory in a field where mathematical time curves and physical space falls toward the center. Simulating a ring accelerator such that, from the outside, it creates a spiral on the surface of an hourglass, where each fragment maintains its acceleration regardless of mass: at the point where the beam reaches the center—that is, the mouth of the hourglass—the beam leaps to the other side through the explosion at the origin of the stars. This is the phenomenon I call Astrophysical Implosion, a phenomenon that marks the birth of galaxies and stars.

214. Since a single celestial body can give rise to an unlimited number of beams of cosmic energy, the reproduction of matter to infinity is a reality that has existed since Eternity. What distinguishes this multiplication to infinity is that, previously, it required Infinity as the pathway for transformation, whereas now the same process is reproduced across space-time fields unfolded by God at the frontiers of the Cosmos. This makes the Cosmos a more massive entity and provides General Space with a higher density of matter, which is why the Cosmos amazes us with new galactic creatures every day that the Hubble opens its eyes. Creation is continuous, and its expansion is constant.

215. We can compare this process of the multiplication of cosmic matter from a General Cosmological Principle to a never-ending chain reaction that amplifies its radius of action and extent as time progresses, expanding from the center toward the frontiers. Our telescopic eyes allow us to admire the movement of galaxies within this constantly expanding General Cosmic Space. And it also allows us to apply the laws of gravity to galactic bodies, observing how they attract and accumulate under the influence of these forces; to this classical law we must add the law of electrodynamic forces, thanks to which the concentration of total mass at a single point is a physical impossibility. This is the extraordinary reason why the motion of the atoms of a hot gas within a container corresponds to the General Cosmological Motion.

CHAPTER 23.—THE GENERAL COSMOLOGICAL SPACE

216. The creation of galaxies as an autonomous phenomenon, set in motion by God through the constant feeding of the transformative field of cosmic energy into astrophysical matter, leads us directly to discover the Cosmos as a field of raw material from which God extracts the matter necessary to build His Works. Our Universe is one of them. It was not the first, nor will it be the last. God’s word on this matter is firm: “Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing on His own, but only what He sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise. For the Father loves the Son and shows Him everything He does, and He will show Him even greater works than these, so that you may be amazed.” The theological implications could not be clearer.

217. But why doesn’t a beam of cosmic energy grow to infinity once the speed-of-light limit has been surpassed? Since the origin of astrophysical matter lies in the leap of cosmic energy—and this leap is conditioned by the transformation of kinetic energy into mass—why, once a flight path simulating a vacuum has been created, does the transformation not continue to infinity? Doesn’t a projectile fired into a vacuum tend to reach infinite speed if given an eternal amount of time? Why, then, does no dark body of infinite mass exist? In short: What kind of safety mechanism sets limits on the leap from cosmic energy to astrophysical matter?

218. Experience provides the answer. The leap toward infinity collides with the critical point of growth—or the Astrophysical Implosion Point—beyond which the stellar body transforms the energy it absorbs into light. Thus, even if the matter-energy system had a clear path, the very dynamic weight of the creative process drives it to a point where the transformation into mass gives way to the transformation into light. And the cycle continues. This critical point, then, lies in the nature of matter in general and is preserved throughout the entire course of the leap—from the quantum to the sidereal, and from the astrophysical to the cosmic. It is another matter entirely to determine how this hard core—the true agent of the interdimensional leap—functions and to what extent its operational cycles accelerate or decelerate. And so on with other questions related to the creative leap itself. For example, what happens when the created galactic mass has consumed the energy of the spacetime field? And other matters as well. We also observe in General Cosmic Space how galaxies follow the natural pattern of a current flowing out of the spout of an hourglass rotating on its axis. When we compare the spiral arms to jets of astrophysical energy propelled by centrifugal forces into General Cosmic Space, the range of galaxies opens up to the amount of energy concentrated at a given moment by a transformation field. Moreover, if we compare these fields to networks in which cosmic energy flows in alternating currents, the previous spectrum fans out before us, and what we have seen so far is but a glimpse of what is yet to come. Galactic species grow through eternity to infinity.

219. And once created, how do galaxies behave? How do they grow? What is the rule that shapes their existence? How do they conserve kinetic energy? What is their relationship with the transforming field, and what is the relationship between this field and the astrophysical gravitational field? Can we deduce from what we see certain laws that will help us understand the nature of that tree of stellar creatures that is the realm of the galaxies? Are we capable, by combining local physical laws, of recreating the grand laws that govern motion in General Cosmic Space? Why do galaxies not obey the famous law of universal gravity? Why do they behave more like swarms of exotic creatures flying without any apparent direction, guided only by the path the wind dictates? Can the Brownian motion they exhibit lead to the application of the laws of electrodynamics to galaxies—by virtue of which laws they repel one another, collide, mix, divide, multiply, and remain perpetually in motion? Does General Cosmological Motion not take into account the neutral nature of the universal gravitational field? And this constant motion of those enormous creatures traveling at fantastic speeds through a Cosmos with an eternal destiny—what kinds of intergalactic currents and winds will they not produce? Are not the nebular storms that sweep through our Galaxy Universe proof of the existence of those intergalactic currents which, stirred up by the General Cosmological Movement, carry masses of cosmic matter back and forth—caused both by the combustion of entire systems and by their existence prior to the creation of the General Cosmological Principle? (In short, when addressing this topic, the questions could pile up one on top of another until they form a mountain. That 20th-century cosmology was omniscient and, discovering a new galaxy with its mighty genius, was already able to assign it a nature, age, and distance is one of those wonders of nature that we must subject to analysis, examination, and critical judgment. But not in this book.)

220. Here it is worth stating that the Idea of the Universe preceded the Universe itself. This is not a matter of dogmatizing or philosophizing. That is not my intention. It is simply a matter of laying on the table a reality as natural as the fact that a site survey is necessary before erecting any engineering structure. And since God knows the laws of His Creation, its dimensions, its phenomenology, and its nature, it is logical and natural that, when considering the construction of a Work, He would draw lines and make calculations, taking into account the influence of the terrain on the future of the structure—in this case, an astrophysical one. Better than I can describe this process of study and reflection preceding the Act of Creation is God Himself, who inspired Solomon with these words about His Wisdom: “Yahweh possessed me at the beginning of His ways, before His works, from of old. From eternity I was established; from the beginning, before the earth came to be. Before the abysses, I was brought forth; before the springs of abundant waters came into being; before the mountains were set in place, before the hills, I was conceived. Before He made the earth, or the fields, or the very dust of the earth. When He established the heavens; when He drew a circle upon the face of the Abyss. When He condensed the clouds on high, when He gave strength to the springs of the Abyss. When He set the sea’s boundaries so that the waters would not cross its limits. When He laid the foundations of the earth, I was with Him as an architect, always being His delight; taking pleasure before Him at all times.”

221. With the Idea in Mind and all calculations resolved, God sets His hand to the Work. In the case of the Heavens, the first thing He did—according to Solomon—was “to draw a circle upon the face of the Abyss.” That is, to mark out the territory, to delineate the perimeter within whose diameters He would create the Heavens. In other words, to specify the dimensions of the material structure by the perimeter assigned to it in Space. The radius and diameter of that circle within whose perimeter He intended to create the heavens are not numbers unknown to us. The significance of this number, based on our understanding of the nature of the cosmic landscape, is perfectly clear—especially when we have before our eyes the photo album that the Hubble telescope freely provides us. Let us not forget that although astronomical photography is limited to offering us a momentary snapshot of matter in time, the phenomena it captures are so similar to those we observe in the local physical world that, by logic, we must deduce from what is known what remains to be known. Don’t nebulae resemble atmospheric storms? And doesn’t it seem as if giant waves of energy were lifting them up and hurling them against the star systems of our Universe?

222. We have now entered the heart of the matter. Galaxies generate powerful currents and winds in General Cosmic Space. These move and follow the directions set by the galaxies themselves. But we are not speaking only of nebular matter. Here we must combine the law of the curvature of light with the flight of cosmic energy. Let’s put it another way. Let’s start with a simpler image. Let’s transform the galaxies into cannons that generate cosmic energy. As they generate it, they fire it into General Cosmic Space. We do not abolish the speed of light within the galactic field; on the contrary, we maintain its limit. And as it makes its way, while circling in search of a path out of the galaxy, the energy jet from one star adds to that of another, ultimately resulting in the projection into General Cosmic Space—not of beams, but of energy currents.

223. This phenomenon of multiplication and concentration of the mass of a particle beam, creating a current that behaves like a hard nucleus, has been observed in particle accelerators. It has been observed that the quantum multiplication of matter through the acceleration of the initial beam’s velocity does not create new, dispersed beams, such that each follows its own trajectory.

224. Outside the galactic gravitational field, the acceleration of the energy streams released by the galaxy tends to increase as they move away from its influence, and to continue increasing as they approach the next galaxy. In this sense, the source of origin—the galaxy—behaves like the cannon in which the beam receives its initial cosmic flight energy, and General Cosmological Space acts as the accelerator in which the beam multiplies and generates the hard nuclei that create the intergalactic currents at the origin of the back-and-forth movements of nebular cosmic matter. These currents move through General Cosmological Space in the same way that rivers carve their beds, winding around the foothills of mountain ranges and rushing in a straight line when the terrain allows. From our Hubblean understanding of the Cosmos, we can deduce the number and variety of currents moving through intergalactic space, the amount of energy they carry, and the consequences for any system that crosses their path without protection against their shock wave.

225. God’s Creation in this dynamic, structured form—the General Cosmological Space transformed into a surface upon which powerful rivers of cosmic energy carve their courses—the final destination of these currents is the Ocean! And what else can this Ocean be but the external creative field within which the transformation of cosmic energy into astrophysical matter takes place? But before reaching their destination—during the journey from their source-canyons to the Ocean that transforms cosmic currents into astrophysical matter—these cosmic currents behave like true cyclones. Just as an old tree falls into a river’s current and is swept downstream, so too do cosmic currents move intergalactic nebular matter from one place to another. And just as the wind follows its course as it approaches a mountain but unloads its burden upon it, so too do the rivers of cosmic energy do the same upon the galaxies they border. Obviously, we cannot detect these currents, but we can infer their existence from our knowledge of matter and from what we see through the eyes of the Hubble.

226. Our Universe-Galaxy, the Milky Way, relates to the rest of Creation according to the parameters of this General Cosmological Movement. Viewed from the outside, our universe behaves like the mountain onto which the cosmos unloads its clouds and from whose depths a new source of electromagnetic water springs forth, spreading its bed across the cosmic field, gathering its intergalactic tributaries, and advancing among the galaxies until it reaches its destination. The origin of the nebulae lies in this interplay of forces; in light of this and considering its dimensions, God endowed our Universe with its own.

CHAPTER 24.—ASTROPHYSICAL ENGINEERING OF CREATION

227. The Creative Intelligence involved itself in the interplay of actions and reactions by creating a Universe designed to withstand the weight of cosmological currents. In other words, God erected the universal edifice, endowed with all the necessary physical mechanisms to overcome the consequences of the upheaval that His own creation would bring about. God also knew that, like soldiers falling on the front lines of battle, many celestial bodies from outside our Universe would succumb to the force of intergalactic currents. What we call novas and supernovas are those warriors who have fallen in battle and disintegrate in spectacular explosions, which in turn give rise to the comets and meteorites that traverse the heavens. Let us pause, then, for a moment to consider the origin of novas and supernovae. And given the amount of physical energy that a hard nucleus is capable of unleashing—considering the similarity between general cosmological space and a particle accelerator— if we elevate the process to the astrophysical dimension and apply the law of mutual influence between field and light, we must conclude that a galactic field reacts to the curvature of the trajectory of cosmic currents by accelerating the rotation rate of its outer stellar belt. Let us explore this behavior further.

228. As we see in God’s Creation, all the systems within a galactic body combine their fields to create a general field that reacts as a whole to the external environment. I have previously compared this general field to an ocean, drawing on Revelation. Assuming this similarity and based on the comparison of the universal field to the volume contained in a glass of water, the action of cosmic currents on the gravitational field translates into the water’s reaction to the movement of a hand that inserts a finger and swirls it around. Since every liquid body has its own movement—natural to the body containing it—acceleration from the outside must affect its outer zones, from which it flows inward, if applicable.

229. Naturally, not all bodies in a system react in the same way to an external force. In the case of stellar systems, this simple law is a daily occurrence. And since the transformation of gravity into light depends on the system’s rotational speed—which is affected by its encounter with cosmic currents—external stellar systems, when exposed to the action of the finger on the water, are constantly accelerated; a reaction that some celestial bodies handle perfectly while others cannot withstand beyond a critical limit. Once this limit is reached, the system’s safety brake fails, and the system escapes internal control and heads toward its destruction. The result is a nova explosion—speaking of an individual star. And if the star triggers a chain reaction that drags its entire system toward destruction due to the heat generated by the accelerated combustion of gravity, we speak of a supernova.

230. Experience speaks for itself. The photo proves it. And reality is what convinces us. Let’s imagine we have a huge ball; we want to make it spin by pushing it, but we can’t. We call for more help, and as more of us join in, we eventually force it to spin. Once it is spinning, the force required to maintain its constant rotation will be less, so that the effect of that same force on the ball will be greater as its speed increases. We now extend this simple experiment to the relationship between a celestial body and its gravitational field. And we agree that the rotation of a gravitational field is similar to that of a solid body in which the celestial body occupies the core. We then compare the action of the cosmic current on this body with that of the force of the hand on the ball. And there we have the physical effect at the origin of novae. Always bearing in mind that the curvature of a cosmic current, such as that of light, would not occur if that current had no mass. If it had no mass, it would have no weight, and if it had neither weight nor mass, the phenomenon of the curvature of light could not exist. From the perspective of optics, the curvature of cosmic energy upon coming into contact with a gravitational field can be compared to the refraction of light. The trajectory of comets as they pass by the Sun helps us uncover the optical structure of the curvature described by cosmic energy as it passes through a gravitational field. But while, unlike cosmic energy, its curvature remains unchanged, in the case of comets we do have the answer that transforms the gravitational field into a reality that behaves, for physical purposes, like a body. And as such, it rotates with the celestial body to which it belongs.

231. Given that the age of stars is measured by the time it takes them to consume the energy of their gravitational field—a consumption process subject to the working speed of the transformer—logic leads us to believe in the existence of a regulatory law governing the relationship between the working revolutions and the system’s lifespan. The question at hand is how to accelerate the operating revolutions of the astrophysical transformer to the point where its lifespan is reduced to the shortest possible time. Logic tells us that there is only one way, and that is by exciting the field to infinity in the same way that liquid contained in a vessel overflows due to centrifugal force. Is this not the cumulative action of forces against the great sphere we were discussing? Well, we are speaking of currents that move in response to stimuli from galactic fields and the excitation of those fields under such responses: the level of excitation caused will be reflected in the intensification of light production. The greater the excitation, the greater the intensity of production and the shorter the system’s lifespan. We must relate the phenomena of cyclical and atypical intensification in stellar systems to this universal behavior.

232. To summarize: In the case of novas and supernovae, excitation refers to the increase in the rate of transformation to infinity. Once the natural braking mechanisms of gravitational systems are overwhelmed, the rotation of the celestial body and the field spiral out of control and interact until they are consumed, reducing millions of years to a matter of seconds. When referring to a simple astrophysical system, we speak of novas. And if it is an entire multiple system that falls into this dynamic, we speak of supernovae. Both occur in the outer constellation belts, which are the most exposed to intergalactic currents. These novae and supernovae are the origin of comets; comets are propelled like cannonballs, their destructive power increasing as they travel greater distances.

233. And in conclusion: With these three lines of action in mind—nebulae, novas, and comets—God structured the constellation distribution around the Solar System, simulating a crystalline gravitational network against whose solidity the danger of interrupting the evolution of the Tree of Life on Earth would be disintegrated. The marvelous positive results evident in reality must not cloud the eyes of our intelligence when we recognize that, in accordance with astronomical dimensions, God traced that Circle upon the Face of the Abyss of which Solomon spoke to us in his Wisdom. What the wise and peaceful king par excellence saw with the eyes of his Wisdom, we—thanks to God—see with our own eyes. Clusters and superclusters in the outer belt, and open clusters and multiple systems in the inner belt, combine to form this crystalline, gravitational, constellational network about which there is still so much to say. Let us begin by unraveling the mystery of the Origin of the Heavens.

CHAPTER 25.—ORIGIN AND CONSTITUTION OF THE HEAVENS

234. We now turn to one of the great questions: the origin of the stars in the Firmament. I believe the answer has already been outlined in the preceding sections. The formation of stars—as the very purpose of the galaxies’ existence— —all leads to the transformation of the Cosmos into a reservoir of raw material from which God extracts the matter with which to create His Works. Since the creation of galaxies is constant, the total mass of raw material that the cosmic field places at God’s disposal to carry out any Work is limitless. How God extracts that stellar matter and transports it from its regions of origin to the Universe is another matter. We, knowing that the way things are done always depends on the Power of the One who does them, and that the imagination required to do them is directly related to the Intelligence of the One who sets out to do them, can speak of great rivers flowing across the intergalactic plains, as the Lord of the Galaxies deems best and in accordance with His working needs. What other Name can we give to the One who creates and governs them? Or how can we subject to our own judgment the laws that govern them and the patterns of behavior of the galaxies and their seas of stars in the face of their Creator’s action upon their bodies? Shall we impose the natural limits of our own imagination upon the Divine imagination? How could we dare to compare our way of living, feeling, breathing, thinking, walking, working, planning, touching, loving, interacting, organizing, laughing, calculating… with those of that Being at the Origin of the Cosmos? From the natural limits of its own reality, how could a creature judge its Creator without proving itself to be committing an act of madness? The beginning and end of human intelligence is wonder; it arises from wonder at Creation and culminates in wonder at its Creator. Anything said beyond this stems from that seed which was not in Man and was sown into his being by a force foreign to God’s Creation—which is a matter for theology. In any case, the great question of the Origin leads us directly to the other great question: the Constitution of the Universe.

235. From what has been read so far, it follows that the Universe and the Cosmos are two different things. Together, these two things form God’s Creation, and within it, the Cosmos is one thing and the Universe is another. The Cosmos is the field of raw matter from which God draws, and with the freedom befitting the Lord, He takes all the materials necessary to carry out His Works. As for the Universe, the Universe is the stellar field where God carries out these Works. When, therefore, Moses speaks to us of the Creation of the Universe, he was referring to this stellar field. Its origin, as we have seen, lies in that cosmological field from which God draws rivers of stars that traverse the intergalactic plains and flow into this universal ocean, in whose waters the Tree of Life took root. There is much to be said about the Tree of Life, especially at this stage of its history. However, not everything has been said regarding the constitution of the Universe.

236. Obviously, Moses speaks in his Account of the Creation of our Heavens. And in doing so, he sets before us a Reality: God is its Creator. A Reality that leads us to another reality: Eternity—that Eternity which implies Infinity. Humanity is the fruit of these realities taken as a whole, but not the only fruit of that Tree of Life to which the God of Infinity and Eternity gave the Universe as a field of Origin and Growth. This final conclusion brings us back to the revelation of the Son of this Creator and Lord of the Cosmos and the Universe: “The Father shows the Son everything He does, and He will show Him greater works than these, so that you may be amazed.” By using the plural when speaking of the past as a reflection of the future, the Son of God reveals to us that our heavens and our earth—in short, that the human race—is not the first harvest that the Tree of Life has yielded. This is a y statement that resolves the dilemma regarding life in the universe. For humanity is neither the first nor will it be the last fruit of this Tree. Before humankind, other worlds were already created, and after humankind, new worlds will spring from the branches of the Tree of Life. “The sons of God” mentioned in the Bible are the fruit of those works that the Son told us the Father does. There is no need to speculate about the regions of origin in the universe of such “sons of God.” The fact is that the knowledge of their existence leads us to a new way of conceiving the Constitution of the Heavens and of the Universe in general.

237. And this way of thinking has to do with the Conception of the Universe. That is, when God conceived it in His Mind, what was the Idea that gave it Origin? Did He create it to be a field on which a house is built, and when it falls due to old age, it is torn down and another is built? Or did He create it to be built up over time, in the same way that a landowner cultivates and transforms his land as time goes by? Did He create the Heavens that surround the Earth—and serve as the cradle of the human race—to be swept away from the Universe by the passage of time, or did He create the Heavens to remain eternally?

238. And considering this last alternative—and knowing that the creation of a world introduces into the Universe a set of constitutional problems of astronomical proportions, as we have seen in the previous sections—is the Universe not a field continually subject to a creative redefinition of its regions due to the transformation of those regions into zones of World Origin? Let us return to the Beginning of the Universe to better define this constant creation of universal geography.

239. Having created the Cosmos as a region that produces Galaxies—and since these are factories of stars—God thinks of Life and conceives a stellar ocean that will grow continuously, and beneath whose Waters Life will take root, spread its Tree, and bear its Fruit. Thus, God initiates the Origin of the Worlds by directing rivers of stars from all parts of the cosmic expanse, which flow from their sources in the galactic mountain ranges across the cosmological plains and empty into a specific space, where they create an Ocean of stars—the Universe. A Universe that is initially amorphous and somewhat wild, in which clusters and superclusters come together and drift apart, and stellar currents move under the influence of the forces at work within this Ocean of stars that have surged onto the shores of the Universe. But the purpose of this movement is to sow Life and reap its Fruit; the horizon that God holds out to the Universe is Infinity; and its age is Eternity. Thus, during each Creative Act, He extends His Hand over a Zone of the Universe and shapes it, sculpts it, identifies it, and endows it with properties—giving form to the amorphous, making identifiable that which had no identity of its own. Within this ongoing Process of Creation of the Universe and as a result of this movement, our Heavens were born. The fundamental question—whether the Heavens of our Firmament were created to remain or to be swept away from space like a sandcastle when the tide rises—has a definitive answer: by creating them and through their creation, God gave form and identity to a region of the General Universe. I believe that in His Book He casually planted the expression: “the Heavens of the heavens,” where the Universe is identified as a series of Heavens—the dwelling place of many heavens—each of which, in the image and likeness of our own, is the cradle and origin of other worlds that once were and other that will be, each with its own unique region. This aspect leads us to another question: navigation through the Universe.

240. The tendency toward infinite growth that God has given the Universe presupposes and implies the need for a universal cosmography that allows for internal navigation through the remote identification of the regions that compose it. God is free and powerful to do as the tide does to a sandcastle, but He did not conceive the Universe that way. He could have compiled the celestial History and Constitution of each World into a book, but in His Mind He conceived that this History and Constitution should remain eternally, with the Heavens becoming the letters of that universal Book, where each Chapter deals with the Creation of a World and its contents. Are not the lines along which the stars are arranged to write this message to human beings beautiful: Infinity + Eternity = God?

THE DIVINE HISTORY OF JESUS CHRIST 2026

DIGITIZED BY RAÚL PALMA GALLARDO

(RPI . Z-229-20 )

info@cristoraul.org